Which players did anything wrong in the Wakey game to justify being dropped?

And when did he say that Faux Loz? He said everyone's performance merited the retention of their jersey, which isn't the same thing at all. You sound like a stupid AP.

Oooops another one to add to the fekwit brigade.

Would you have said the same had we played Featherstone the other week?

Considering the oppossitions effect it is a similar comparison.

[urlhttp://www.saintsrlfc.com/news/603[/url

Thats a big loss for Saints, I think we may have a chance now.

It is exactly the same thing. He said we should keep the same team as the Wakey game, because of the performance that day. What performance?

Wakey were a pish poor side on the day and are no comparison to a great Saints side. Only a numpty would think differently.

Only you have made that comparison though, albeit in slightly broken English, so that's OK. It is not "exactly the same thing." If it were, you would never be able to use recent form to pick a team unless you played the same opposition 2 weeks in a row. Only a person with no capacity for lateral thought would think it was.

If the coach's view of the best 17 were selected for the last game, regardless of who it was against, and all members of that team performed to the standard expected, what cause is there to drop them just because the opposition is better? None of them were selected from outside the 1st team squad after all.

Otherwise you might suggest dropping someone who did the job in the last game, against whatever opposition, in favour of somebody who didn't. Why does your way make any more sense oh wise one?

Gives Leeds the edge now imo.

Massive loss for us.

Will be a very, very close match.

Your pack are very physical, they will take it to us all day long.

Why have you started using this alias again after leaving it dormant for two years?



Anyone who feels the need to post under an alias for the purposes of taking the pi55 out of Lawrie is below Fekkwitt level and hardly worthy of the benefit of my knowledge.

Would you care to "out" the ginger hobbit by revealing their identity, for those of us not in the know?

Yes I am a fekwit for suggesting playing the same side two games in a row after a very good performance. Im obviously crazy.

If the same team that played against Wakey had played against Fev then yes I would.

Eh?

Lets see if he makes a fool of himself a bit more first.

Clearly he didn't have the cahones to tackle the alpha male under his true identity.

Mwah ha ha ha ha.

Gareth, are you self-nicknaming again?

boom boom.

i hope i'm proved wrong but i think it's a big mistake not using thackery.
wakey were there for the taking, saints won't be. as i say, i hope smith proves me wrong but i'm not happy about it

It's a good one though. Better than Ginger Hobbit.

PS, PM'd you

Whilst thackray provides good go forward in short stints, he'll be a liability when it comes to playoff rugby.

His handling isn't reliable enough and he's prone to give away a few too many penalties.

Errors need to be at a minimum therefore i think it's a clever decision from tactician Tony Smith to drop him.

didn't do much wrong in the 2005 cup final

Mistake leaving Thackray out of the 18..........more to offer than either Ablett or Kirke in my opinion.

Given that Tony Smith has rather more information to base his team selection on.......

Can you remember the last 2 mins of the game?

In regards to Long and Fausavalu (SPELLING), i won't believe it till i see it. Saints are always upto mind games and wouldn't be surprised to see them both playing.

are you kidding?

They've been withdrawn from their 18 man squad, they can't IIRC.

IIRC teams may make one change to their named 18 man squad between now and kick-off. Seem to remember Saints not naming Wellens in the 18 or 20 for a game last year or the year before, but he recovered from injury quicker than expected and was on the team sheet.