Quote ="tvoc"No it doesn't really help as putting Tigers, Cas or even Castleford would all be acceptable in identifying the Wheldon Road mob and they are not the subject of the query here. However using 'Cats' to indicate your prediction in a game involving Les Catalans Dragons and the Wakefield trinity Wildcats could be ambiguous when it's a term you've used for both in the past. Week 2: No problemo Week 3: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Cats = Les Catalans Dragons Week 12: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=452124&start=15 Cats = Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Week 19: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240 Cats = ?'" OK now i get the point i meant catalans if that clears it up!!

Quote ="tvoc"No it doesn't really help as putting Tigers, Cas or even Castleford would all be acceptable in identifying the Wheldon Road mob and they are not the subject of the query here. However using 'Cats' to indicate your prediction in a game involving Les Catalans Dragons and the Wakefield trinity Wildcats could be ambiguous when it's a term you've used for both in the past. Week 2: No problemo Week 3: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Cats = Les Catalans Dragons Week 12: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=452124&start=15 Cats = Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Week 19: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240 Cats = ?'" OK now i get the point i meant catalans if that clears it up!!

You used a three letter abbreviation for each of your predictions, which is why I agreed with FoxyRhino's interpretation. I wouldn't forsee a problem in your case.




All your other predictions that week used nicknames, of sorts, in that respect I'd interpret Cats as an abbreviation for Wild=#FF0000cats rather than =#FF0000Catalan=#FF0000s.

Not my problem though either way, over to the competition administrator to make a ruling.

Its silly to predict so early in the week

Here's the top eight and those (perhaps of some interest) bunched together on 89 to be going on with.

103 FoxyRhino
103 Old Feller
102 Gotcha
101 rhinos69
101 LFCRhino
100 Craigloiner
100 Hopie
100 steve slippery morris

89 Frosties
89 Glenn Quagmire
89 Sam Buca
89 tvoc

Good place to be on 89 isn't it

You're in pretty good company there, although what they collectively know about RL you could write on the back of a postage stamp.

Ahem.

Confused how thats happened seen as I have given you the right amount on my database and table. I apologise

I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score

Quote ="leicester_rhino"I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score'" Not your concern old luv, someone has selflessly taken it upon themselves to perform that function for every entrant and every entry this season. He tells me that you scored [size=2001[/size (One) this week. If you'd like a third opinion the original thread is here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240&start=15

Quote ="leicester_rhino"I can't see last weeks predictions thread, so I can't verify my pathetic score'" Not your concern old luv, someone has selflessly taken it upon themselves to perform that function for every entrant and every entry this season. He tells me that you scored [size=2001[/size (One) this week. If you'd like a third opinion the original thread is here viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460240&start=15

This week's remaining Issue highlighted in =#FF0000red

While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.

While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.

Quote ="tvoc"While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.'" Quote ="FoxyRhino"Sponsor #13 Hull by 20 Saints by 24 Huddersfield by 16 Wigan by 14 Crusaders by 10 Castleford by 8 Warrington by 12'" 109? FoxyRhino was on 103 before this week and got six points this week

Quote ="tvoc"While we await the official update, this week's Top Tipsters were Rhino46, rhinochris, rotherhamrhino and Sarahgrhino all with 8. Depending on the outcome of the official verdict on the validity of two posts (or parts thereof) it's entirely possibly that we will emerge with a new stand-alone leader. Discussed here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=30 and here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=460915&start=45 Provisional Polesitter - FoxyRhino with 108.'" Quote ="FoxyRhino"Sponsor #13 Hull by 20 Saints by 24 Huddersfield by 16 Wigan by 14 Crusaders by 10 Castleford by 8 Warrington by 12'" 109? FoxyRhino was on 103 before this week and got six points this week

Yup 109.

It was a mis-type onto this thread. Panic over.

That's why you're the boss.

__________

I think you've set a dangerous precedent with this week's scoring though.

Won't you now be powerless to impose any penalty on a future similar occurrence?

And what if a poster goes on to make the play-offs by virtue of the points awarded from games already completed at the time of an edit?

As the sole trustee of the competition's integrity I think it's something you should consider carefully.

Is it equitable for you to penalise a late (but still in-gametime) entry when allowing an edited entry after the very same games have completed to stand?

Excuse me Mr. Tvoc sir, how dare you leave our club!

It was fun while it lasted, we had some great times together (and shared some pain) but we all change and it's probably time for me to move on and gather some new experiences. I'll never forget you though and I hope we can still be friends.

Besides I'm not sure I'd want to belong to any club that would allow me as a member.

I'll probably see you next week.

As a long time player of this tipping/prediction game I can only agree with the above, no points should be given for posting a prediction/editing a prediction after a game has kicked off (just ask any bookie!)

if people need to add information then seperate posts can easily be made, any edit raises suspicions which we dont want in our game

Anyone spot any errors this week? I'm sure it'll be littered with them

Not only will there be no errors this week (at least no deliberate ones) but each entrant will find his/her/it's name spelled correctly.

I'll say one thing it's not quite as easy as it looks.

I expect Frosties will be all over it like a rash. I know I would be if I were him. Payback time.

I've organised a multi-entrant prediction competition elsewhere and not making mistakes takes a lot of concentration (and a good spreadsheet construction).

=#FF0000This week's issue/s highlighted in red: