The same way that made the clean break in the first place?

And he didn't bomb a cast iron try - he simply failed to keep hold of the ball when tackled. He was never going to beat the cover to the line and was duly caught.

There was one bit of quick thinking from Buderus that impressed me last night. He got us a penalty on the last tackle when he noticed the markers weren't stood square. Not only did he spot it and take advantage of it, he managed to still be in a position to offload the ball if the penalty wasn't given, which was essential on the 6th tackle.

What a stupid suggestion, anyone with eyes would have been able to see Diskin's contribution off the bench on his first spell last night. His second spell was hounded by others dropping the ball.

He was actually trying to kick the ball through for JJB must failed to connect foot on ball - a poor decision and execution given the state of the game at the time

Cast iron try? Do me a favour. The most disappointing aspect of that phase for me was that JJB was the main supporting player. No criticism of him intended but I'd rather have seen someone else there.

Been saying this for ages.

Must be in Buderus' contract that he gets the 9 jersey and the starting berth.

Were Leeds in breach of said contract in 2009 then when Buderus started on the bench eight times from seventeen appearances?

No, Hetherington is cute, the contract stipulates that the "majority" of the games must be started hence 9 from 17 were starts.

BTW, how many of those 8 came when he first was getting into the side following his initial injury?

Bleeding lawyers and double glazing salesmen.

Probably most of them.

At the end of the day, you can't blame last night on either of them...we were just crap!

I can accept any defeat in "Modern Day Super League" it looks like the league could finally become a Competitive one and if you don't bring your "A-Game" then these "Shocks/Upsets" could happen on a regular basis.

Saints are playing with 3 tonight. Not that its working out for them though

He made the initial break and the supporting player was JJB - no sign of McGuire or Burrow (maybe one of them had just been tackled?) - if there was a poor decision it was possibly off JJB as he seemed to have faster support on his right but opted to go left to Diskin. Diskin would never have made it to the line and had nobody to pass on because of the cover so opted for the kick.

Its reasonable to bag the execution but I doubt thats a position he's found himself in often or one he trains for.

Criticism if anything that it was a forward that made the break, another that carried it on and the first was the one on hand to support again. Had a back taken the ball either after the 1st break or from JJB's pass it'd have been 6 points IMO.

It's the future.

Roby looked pretty handy on the right wing most of the night.

I thought I'd test out whether two hookers is better than one last night.

It is, I am a bit skint and lacking fluids this morning but its' definitely the way to go.

he shouldn't have tried to kick it. there was nobody else there! he should have taken the tackle, it was only about the 3rd.
still, we all have brain farts at one time or another

unexpected loss against perceived inferior opponents results in attempt to find problem where there isn't one shocker

Jeez, must have been the easiest 30 seconds of their life............................

I reckon you ........................

.......................very early!!

Why prolong the end goal. The end goal being MY satisfaction.

Hm. Ealry season loss on heavy pitch when squad focused on World Club Challenge. Shock? Not me. I think some people need to understand that we are not light years ahead of the rest of SL.

You should try 3 hookers in the 17, it's the future.

McShane Full Back?

You could argue that we did. We had the England hooker playing as well.

Sorry but

...