Edited for accuracy.

I think its pathetic when you quote the AUP.

Why the hell are people still engaging with this guy?

Aye, that too.

And what a great example you're setting.



I think it's pathetic people can't abide by it.

Is Fishta criticising the moderating process?

Quite.

I particularly like how your subjective opinions are somehow proven and how your complete and utter defeat on point 10 remains to be confirmed by some future occurrence. The only actual evidence you offered to support your claim was systimatically torn apart and yet despite this you remain unconvinced. Priceless.

You also forgot:

11) It really doesn't matter - Disproved
12) Ryan Hall led with his elbow - Disproved
13) Sean Long faces 5 match ban for same offence as Ryan Hall - Disproved
14) "Danny McGuire News" on google, one of the first links etc - Disproved
15) Long didn't do anything wrong - Disproved - to be confirmed
16) Joel Tomkins used an elbow on Yeaman - Disproved
17) tvoc agreed with me - Disproved (sarcasm doesn't count as agreement)
1icon_cool.gif I will gladly admit I'm wrong, IF I am indeed wrong - Disproved (we're still waiting)

That's only from reviewing the last few pages I expect there may have been others along the way too.

How's the Fishsta-world digital scoreboard looking know? No doubt it'll be something like 14-2.

There's been no moderating to criticise, so no, obviously not.



To be fair, not being a Leeds fan, I'm hardly likely to have a wealth of evidence available for me to present. I've got what I remember from watching plenty of Leeds matches on TV and the matches I've been to.

The thing with McGuire and his position in defence is that it was pointed out on the old "Bullrage.com" forum that he usually slots in on the wing. The next match I looked out for it, and sure enough there he was, when defending he slid out to the wing.

This is why I'm unconvinced. This is why I say, let's watch the next match he features in for Leeds and see where he goes. If he doesn't go out to the wing in defence, then I'll humbly bow to your knowledge. If he does, then you're going to be eating a big slice of humble pie yourself. You can't say fairer than that.



Disproved how? Also, you can't count the same point twice to try and artificially boost your score.



I gave you the time on iPlayer that it happened, yes? So entirely PROVEN, actually. If I was allowed to post screencaps, I would.



And again, point 8 is proven with this gem... Sean Long IS charged with contact with the elbow, and does indeed face a potential 5 match ban. Just because Hall got away with it doesn't make him any less guilty.



Disproved how? I posted the link for you.



Firstly I never said he didn't do anything wrong, I said I wondered because the footage isn't the best. One camera angle from the far side of the pitch, no slo-mo, it's hard to pick out the intent, point of impact and so on.



Joel himself said he raised the elbow, so there's ANOTHER for point 8. The RFL ruled that contact was with the forearm, but the elbow was foremost.



Where was the sarcasm?



Then you missed it, because I did.



Close, I make it 13-2 taking away your duplicated / made-up points.

Look guys, it's been fun, but I'm going to go chat to some more intelligent folks until McGuire's return over in the Wigan and Warrington sections.

I've fed these trolls for long enough, I think.

I find your posts almost as enthralling as your web site on fruit machines, so yes, I agree with you, you've hung around here long enough - how about you go away now and only return when you've learned to stop keeping scores on pathetic points as if any of it matters ?

This really is the funniest thread in quite some time.

I'm surprised you've continued to bite tvoc? I know you like a good debate but I didn't have you down as the sort to get dragged into arguing with someone so, erm... [choosing words carefully... I'm going to plump for... "special".


P.s. I know we're not keeping scores on pathetic points, but FWIW I make it 1-0 to Mc_F and the final whistle has gone!

Some people are on the pitch, they think its all over !

Actually, no its not, its up to the fruit machine fan to draw a line.

I enjoy a good chomp every now and again, that said, I fear this particular poster actually believes the stuff he comes out with, so it deserves at least some moderate level of engagement. And as people have noted it's usually amusing to see how his mind eh..... works.

He usually drops in after a Wigan - Leeds game says his piece and leaves vowing to return with the evidence or an apology ...... only he never does. Even when McGuire returns to action and defends between right centre and right wing (as he almost certainly will given the evidence of the previous 8 years and where Sinfield has defended in his absence under Coach McDermott) he'll be silent.

Bearing in mind his evidence so far to prove that point somewhat fell at every conceivable stage, McGuire was attacking not defending, he was in centre field, almost equidistant from both touchlines, Gardner turned out to be Meli, the try was scored just to the side of the posts nowhere near the wing as he claimed. In fact the accuracy of his critique was nil after the word 'McGuire'

Even a prosecution team led by Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro, F. Lee Bailey, Alan Dershowitz, Robert Kardashian, Gerald Uelmen, Carl E. Douglas, Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld are gonna struggle to get a conviction.

[size=50(Yes I realise they were defence lawyers in the notorious case) [/size

Cheers la.

At first I found this thread quite interesting.

Then by about page 3 some kind of uber web geek had arrived, to grace it with the views of somebody who clearly spends too much time on web forums (almost certainly including those relating to "World of Warcraft" and whatever else the well-heeled nerd-about-town does in their mum's spare room these days) came along. This was funny for about 2 pages. Then I flicked ahead to page 13 and found he/she was STILL at it.

Doesn't the AUP say something about not getting all aroused by proving things on the internet? If not, then please can I request a change? Also, shouldn't the poster in question be spending more time making sure all his/her wizards aren't getting eaten by goblins or something? That should be in the AUP too. Imaginary creatures may be harmed whole you focus your attention here.

In conclusion:

Good thread this.

LEEEROOOOOOOY JENNNKINNNNNNS!

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YersIyzsOpcFishta gets his subscription cancelled, and finds out Danny Mags never played on the wing...[/url

I'll have you know that if you manage to get to Level 30 Warlock, and trade the Medallion of Morgark in for a Jereliona Pendant, then just download the extended add-on pack, tweak a few lines of the coding, then change the parameters in the sub-menu so that it thinks a Medusla Diamond (which isn't available until level 43) is actually an Amulet of Gorithion, then it's more than possible to leave your Wizard unattended for up to an hour.

Smart ar[is[/ie.

I typed "whole" instead of "while" and know nothing about mythical-creature-based computer games. I'm going to get a right cyber-shoeing when fishta gets back from the comic book shop.

I think he's gone at last

I bet he doesn't like cake

My website's not for everyone, and neither's the level of [iun[/itelligence on show here by your fellow "fans".

Oh, and my website's not primarily about fruit machines, there's a whole host of classic gaming and of course the TI99/4A project. Tell us your interests, I'm sure they can be ridiculed just as much.



Wrong. I've never been proved wrong on anything on here before this episode, so never needed to apologise for anything. I'm NEVER silent.



And still winning. As for WoW, never played it, probably never will. Is it 16-2 now?



17-2.



I'll concede that one. Unless it's a plain chocolate sponge cake, maybe with icing, or a parkin. Cream cakes and anything involving jam are right out, along with Jaffa Cakes.

Plenty of fruit cakes on this forum, though.

awe awright then

Told you he still hadn't gone didn't I

I've more stuff like that in my PM's

You've all been very naughty laughing at his web site like that



Oh wait, that was me.

Who was it called him a "Thick Pie F****r" ?

He didn't like that one bit, I think it struck a chord, anyway, enough time wasting here I've some catching up to do on the T199/4A project, its f'kin important stuff you know...

Its like watching Charlie Sheen. A long sad breakdown while they insist they are still 'winning'.

I think a standard response of a famous poster is required here.


Oh.

Cheers Buca lad.

Just so you all know, I'm beating Fishsta 18-0 in my game.