I quite like ryan bailey as a player when he puts his mind to playin but wots with all the cheap shots he keeps tryin to dish out???

"niggle"??

I have no qualms personally about the penalties, as i think refs act too fast and harshly on Bailey, and in a lot of cases he gets penalised for things others would not.

His tackle stats there are excellent, especially the no misses for a prop.

Defend him most of time personally, although I will say those average metres gained are not great.

How do his stats compare to our other props?

In the Warrington game or averaged over the four rounds completed?

The Warrington game.

Starting Props:

Bailey:
Metres Made 56
Carries 13
Tackles 25
Offloads 0
Runs from Dummy Half 0
Tackle Busts 1
Marker Tackles 5
Clean Breaks 0
Missed Tackles 0
Errors 0
Penalties =red2

Metres per carry 4.31
Tackiling Efficency 1.00

Burgess:
Metres Made 71
Carries 13
Tackles 21
Offloads 1
Runs from Dummy Half 0
Tackle Busts 3
Marker Tackles 2
Clean Breaks 0
Missed Tackles =red4
Errors 0
Penalties =red1

Metres per carry 5.46
Tackiling Efficency 0.84

Interchange Props:

Leuluai:
Metres Made 59
Carries 8
Tackles 25
Offloads 0
Runs from Dummy Half 0
Tackle Busts 0
Marker Tackles 6
Clean Breaks 0
Missed Tackles =red3
Errors =red1
Penalties 0

Metres per carry 7.38
Tackiling Efficency 0.89

Peacock:
Metres Made 46
Carries 8
Tackles 9
Offloads 0
Runs from Dummy Half 0
Tackle Busts 0
Marker Tackles 1
Clean Breaks 0
Missed Tackles 0
Errors 0
Penalties 0

Metres per carry 5.75
Tackiling Efficency 1.00

Don't Be A Tight Git And Buy The Real Deal...

Cheers. Looks like overall our best prop.

Highest work-rate of the four.

More fallacy's smashed on Southstander today.

I couldn't comment without knowing the total minutes each spent on the field. Opta is rubbish really.

S'funny though how Burgess errors (penalties and missed tackles) were 5 and Kylie's 4, yet Bailey's were 2.

I suspect those stats will be similar week on week.

yet the fekkwitts on here wouldn't appreciate that.

I bet you can guess what's coming next.

Quote ="G1"S'funny though how Burgess errors (penalties and missed tackles) were 5 and Kylie's 4, yet Bailey's were 2. I suspect those stats will be similar week on week. yet the fekkwitts on here wouldn't appreciate that.'" I've been fighting bailey's corner here aswell see if you can guess who i am www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A48384327

Quote ="G1"S'funny though how Burgess errors (penalties and missed tackles) were 5 and Kylie's 4, yet Bailey's were 2. I suspect those stats will be similar week on week. yet the fekkwitts on here wouldn't appreciate that.'" I've been fighting bailey's corner here aswell see if you can guess who i am www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A48384327

Don't dissapoint TVOC

Meters per carry 4.3? That is shocking.

That's right. It's past eight, time to put the little uns to bed and read them a story. School in the morning.

Back to work now:

Combining Missed Tackles, Errors & Penalties:

8 - Leuluai : 9 in 4 Appearances (Inc. 8 Missed Tackles)
10 - Peacock : 8 in 4 Appearances (+1 sin-binning)
16 - Bailey : 10 in 3 Appearances (inc. 6 Penalties)
19 - Burgess : 11 in 4 Appearances (Inc. 8 Missed Tackles)

Quote ="rhinoms"I've been fighting bailey's corner here aswell see if you can guess who i am www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A48384327'" Bet you can't guess who I am on there

Quote ="rhinoms"I've been fighting bailey's corner here aswell see if you can guess who i am www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A48384327'" Bet you can't guess who I am on there

I have absolutely no idea

I'm on that thread!

There's hardly much chat about the rhinos on that website so mainly talk about footy on there and rugby on here

Or not as the case maybe but I'm sure they're spinable if you put your colossal mind to it.

i am leaving those stats and hoping the thread will drift away silently.

I used too many grey cells playing yesterday to have to exercise them again today.

Today I will just be calling people fekkwitts.

On Bailey this week: www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=786 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=787 No action on the high tackle, and a 'formal caution' for striking, in the fight in the last quarter. As a team we've sailed very close to the wind for these fights, lets knock these on the head, surely another incident will lead a player to be banned. Which we can do without. Nice to see the Leeds props of today slugging side by side.

On Bailey this week: www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=786 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=787 No action on the high tackle, and a 'formal caution' for striking, in the fight in the last quarter. As a team we've sailed very close to the wind for these fights, lets knock these on the head, surely another incident will lead a player to be banned. Which we can do without. Nice to see the Leeds props of today slugging side by side.

Nice to have a change from time to time.

Quote ="thebloodbath"On Bailey this week: www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=786 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=787 No action on the high tackle, and a 'formal caution' for striking, in the fight in the last quarter. As a team we've sailed very close to the wind for these fights, lets knock these on the head, surely another incident will lead a player to be banned. Which we can do without. Nice to see the Leeds props of today slugging side by side.'" Are you suggesting they just stand there and take the punches? If we were actually starting the fisticuffs I can understand the issue. But certainly in the case of last Sunday, do you not think the oppossition are trying to get us into that sort of position? To me if one player can throw a punch, then he should be able to take one.

Quote ="thebloodbath"On Bailey this week: www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=786 www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=787 No action on the high tackle, and a 'formal caution' for striking, in the fight in the last quarter. As a team we've sailed very close to the wind for these fights, lets knock these on the head, surely another incident will lead a player to be banned. Which we can do without. Nice to see the Leeds props of today slugging side by side.'" Are you suggesting they just stand there and take the punches? If we were actually starting the fisticuffs I can understand the issue. But certainly in the case of last Sunday, do you not think the oppossition are trying to get us into that sort of position? To me if one player can throw a punch, then he should be able to take one.

Good, cue Alan Partridge, 'Nobody does it better. oooh bit of bush.'



Speaking of which where was Paul Rauhihi at the disciplinary this week?