The game where Warrington gained nearly 400 more metres than us with only 12 more carries, they had 15 clean breaks and we missed 46 tackles?

Hmmmm, wonder why I highlighted the FIRST HALF of the season......



You yourself admit that the debate is about the FIRST HALF of the season, hence why I highlighted the defensive numbers for the FIRST HALF of the season. The only person cherry picking numbers is you by including stats from the likes of Rounds 21/22/23 which can't be classified as FIRST HALF of the season.

So even though you've admitted that the debate was about the FIRST HALF of the season you're now wriggling because someone actually listed numbers for the FIRST HALF of the season and didn't sweeten them with better numbers for his argument from the 2nd half of the season.

Keep digging lad.

Yeah, the game where we went in at half time 18-12 down having conceded the first from Delany knocking on in our own twenty, the second starting with a knock on on the 5th from McGuire, the 4th built from a nothing kick from the halfway line to touch. 6th a pass thrown in to touch. 7th from JJB getting stripped on the 4th, the game when Hardaker dropped it running in to his own man on the first infront of the posts and in the middle of the worst of Watkins soap hands.

Watch that game and see how many of their tries came from sets we failed to complete, how many times we threw the ball to ground or touch, how many errors we made in attack,

Why you lying tho?


ill just point out again, we conceded fewer points in the first half of the season than the second.

Defence was disorganised and too soft too often, attack was disorganised and innefective.
If those statements are correct then it would surely have resulted in a terrible record breakingly bad season. And it did.

Where's the lie? The debate has been about the first half of the season, I provided the numbers for the first half of the season. We didn't concede fewer points in the first half of the season.

sweetheart, none of those numbers refer to the first half of anything. How has your own post managed to confuse you so much?

Looks like printers getting sucked into the proverbial black hole of a smokey quote-athon.

Last time I checked there was 30 league games in the season and 16 games in is pretty near as dammit the halfway mark.

Let's be honest we can all see through why you're defending the defence. It all goes back to the thread last week about the hooking position and people pointing out the obvious problems it causes in defence when we don't have a proper hooker and you being so desperate to argue it because you wouldn't hear anything bad said about Rob Burrow causing us issues in defence. It's so transparent because in your criticism on here about the attack you only pinpoint Lilley and Sutcliffe for blame, even though no one has made more starts this year in the 'spine' positions of 6,7 & 9 as Burrow yet you're very quiet of apportioning any blame on your favourite player.

So go on, carry on making a fool of yourself and looking like you've got little to zero actual RL knowledge just because you're desperate to defend Burrow.

That is wonderful.
Why you lying again? I wouldn't single out Lilley and Sutcliffe to blame for our attacking problems. Nor have I.

and the reason I have 'defended our defence' as 'not that bad' is because...well... it hasn't been that bad. ill point out once again, our defence has conceded 99points more than a treble winning side, it has conceded less than Cas, only 50 more than Saints, our offence has scored 354 points fewer than last year, it has gone from the best attack in the league by a distance, to the worst, it has scored more than no-one.

That our offence has been atrocious whilst our defence has been merely 'not too bad' is not an argument in favour or against our 2nd Top Metre making, 2nd top tackle busting, top clean breaking, top try assisting hooker Rob Burrow.

Rather than rely on statistics to build an argument, I prefer to rely on my own eyes and brain. On the occasions that I've watched Leeds this year, they have been powderpuff in defence and clueless in attack. The combination of both items have resulted in our league position. It's easier to fix up defence than attack, but largely we've failed to do this to an acceptable level, so the pressure on the failing attack grew with each passing game.

Without major improvements in both areas next season, likely needing new personnel, we will continue to struggle.

All this against the backdrop of the poorest quality SL in recent years.

Lots of work to do is my synopsis, and I don't need the stats to come to this conclusion.

Apart from this....



Only seeing two of our pivots highlighted for our struggles to score points





True it has done over the course of the 23 rounds of the regular season......however we were all discussing the the first half of the year.

Why you lying again?

why you lying again?

....so enough to lose 99 more games than last year



....so enough to lose 50 more games than Saints



....so enough to win more games than last year



....oh OK

Your obeisance at the feet of the God OPTA is duly noted

How can any of you be d with this sh ite?!

I was just thinking the same thing myself.

Its very similar to mugwump's weird science thread.

Seems like every topic goes this way

It may seem that way, however when consulting the stats it tells us there is a rise of only 1.16 % on Bulls$@it written this year compared to 2015 and infact 4.8 % decrease in thread drift when comparing the two periods. So you lot continue your circle jerk

You need to include more lines in your post so I can quote and dissect each one individually with a detailed analysis.

I like this 100%.

Is that a slight increase on how much you liked things last year or has your likes decreased based on what you quoted?

Cognitive dissonance rules!!

five and a half years and he still won't go!!....for the live of God