[uTranslation:[/u I lied and because I didn't know Quins were playing Warrington I tripped myself up.

did you seriously think

''mathers was there...laughing at bailey'' was a serious comment?

Of course it was serious. It was fookwitted and it was you.

Gee let me think...........

I will, of course, continue with TMFMISL - it's a brand of it's own.

The campaign is increasing pace.



Try typing 'The Most Feared Man In Super League' into Google, it comes up with the option on the short list so it knows what you are looking for.

Is it wrong to feel proud?

TMFMISL does his job of winding up again

As usual he gets the blame though. Radford has done nothing wrong at all. Totally innocent. Imagine if that was the other way around, people would have been calling for a 10 game ban for Bailey.

Indeed



I'm sure there'll very soon be all kinds of frothing at the mouth both on here and elsewhere from all the Bailey haters about that incident. To be fair though, there's no way anyone can prove that the elbows from Bailey were intentional, hence the reason he wasn't pulled up at all for it. He wasn't even looking at Radford at the time, and it was simply caused by him trying to get to his feet quickly for a quick play of the ball. If anything, Ian Smith was at fault for not calling "held" quicker and ordering Radford off so Bailey could play the ball. What Radford did then was pure stupidity, and left Smith with no real option. Tough bloke though, getting 3 or 4 shots in against a bloke on the floor - for someone who obviously sees himself as a bit of a hard man his shots didn't seem to bother Bailey much

Should have been a sin bin for both. Bailey got off scot free and Radford gets treated very harsh. Was dirty play by Bailey but then radford reacted.

How dare you suggest Bailey's elbows weren't intentional.

Were you OJ's lawyer by any chance?

Am quite sure that the elbows to the head were unintentional, after all its not as if this is an 11 page thread about bailey being a cheap shot merchant is it??

What Radford did was stupid but both players should have been sinbinned imo.

Radford lost it. His fault nobody roses but of course that's not on some tards agenda

Yep, 3 or 4 clean punches in against a man on the floor incapable of defending himself, right in front of the ref - very harshly treated!!! What more did he need to do to get a red???!!!

Oh, sorry.... I forgot that Bailey's automatically guilty, by virtue of him being Bailey

Go get yourself an early bath Radford.



Immense accuracy from Radford in easy circumstances. What an idiot

Oh come on, Radford is practically due a WBO title shot according to Hull supporters.

And still TMFMISL gets back up

Bailey was trying to get up. Radford was holding him down - incidents like that happen quite often. What Radford did was stupid and unnecessary, and he got what he deserved!

Serious question here. Has Ryan Bailey ever stood toe to toe with someone and come off best. Ive never actually seen him stand to toe with anyone. Only time I can remember was when he started punching a bradford player straight from the scrum and then ran off when he realised his punches werent hurting the bradford player

So was Bailey elbowing Radford in the head.

Woah and i thought i was guilty of wearing blinkers sometimes.

Obviously, Bailey's elbows caught Radford - the question is though, was it blatant intent? Bailey was looking in the opposite direction and trying to get up. It's the referee's job to adjudge whether or not it was foul play, not Radford's - "play to the whistle" and all that........

And of course.... no agenda or blinkers from the Bailey haters???

Radford shat himself so hard he never came back on after that.

I'm a Bailey 'lover', but he's a dirty so and so !