To summarise:



SL Regular Rounds: With Ganson (98 to date)



Bradford Played 42, Won 25, Drawn 2, Lost 15, 62%



SL Regular Rounds: Without Ganson (96 to 200icon_cool.gif



Bradford Played 305, Won 221, Drawn 8, Lost 76, 74%



Not an exact like for like timescale but there's a limit to how much time I'm prepared to give to this.

So without Ganson in charge we have a 12% better chance of a win

Most of which you won......

Basically, yes it appears so.



Listen to the voices they can't all be wrong.

I say we get him on Trisha and let the interrogaters see if he is



a) a cheat

b) hates the Bulls

c) knew that Tansey was offside and in front and just thought I'll rob the Bulls

d) all of the above

Since we're being a bit geeky, those timescales are in fact probably (I couldn't say definitely as I don't have the stat-age) going to distort the final outcome significantly. 2 obvious reasons for this spring tro mind:



1) The period from 96-98, included in the "without" stats but not the "with" numbers, were probably, I reckon, a period of greater success for the Bulls than the last 2/3 years, which will mean they are likely to bost that win percentage a bit.



2) Particularly in the last few years, Mr Ganson has been likely to be in charge of big games, which will tend to be against the top teams, in other words, teams to whom Bradford are more likely to lose.



Just a thought.

That would be ace.



e) knew that Poching was shoved at the play the ball in the 2003 FE but gave a scrum head and feed to Wigan to rob Leeds of another GF appearance

So what are you saying ????

He would get found out so he never would go on the show.



We could have a Cheats special, get Cummings and that slime ball Russell Smith back for it.

Accepted but like I said there's a limit to the amount of time I'm giving to this one bearing in mind the desired outcome is primarily to fuel Mick's psychosis.

That despite your ramblings there really is no useful evidence to support your paranoia.

CARDIFF 2007