For someone like your self who is in love with all things NRL, having played SoO he should at the very least be able to handle it in Superleague. I questioned his signing at the time on the basis that we better props already on the books.

As i said, there are some in RL with an inferiority complex which has manifested as masochism. Why on earth does Peacock need to spend years of his life on the other side of the world to prove something to you? How does the British game benefit from having its best players not playing in the british game? Why should we be applauding people for choosing to play for one team over another? Why do so many people seem to spend so much time simultaneously creaming over some pretty average Aussie talent whilst constantly self-flagellating because of GB RL players if not inferiority manifesting as masochism?

regards, Petero Civoniceva

We constantly complain about the lack of coverage our game gets - perhaps if we able to compete with the Aussies at international level we might get some coverage.

Unless a larger number of our top players experience the intensity of the NRL we will see the same outcome as we have for the past 40 years - that is how the British game will benefit - simple concept really!!

Aussie talent has shown what is required - do you think keeping you best players in an inferior comp will help us be more competitive?

The british game wont benefit from having fewer quality players in it. Having a higher quality league will help us be more competitive. Having a lower quality league wont. We need investment in coaching and youth development and a removal on the reliance on and over-estimation of the talents of overseas players.

We can and do frequently produce teams which are competitive with Aus and NZ but we dont have the depth of player to win and to win consistently. That is the difference, the depth of talent. There is no doubt a player at the upper echelons of SL would be in a similar position in the NRL despite what the self-flagellators will have you believe.

Well played against Saints so far JP.

Definitely worth an extended contract until he's 37.

HEE-HAW!

Well done Jeff, superb infantile post. Your true colours have been well and truly revealed.

All the posts since the extension was announced trying to pass yourself off as some kind of knowledgable RL sage just so you could go Nah Nah Na Nah Nah at the first poor performance by JP since signing the extension.

If thats JP's worst performance for the next two years you are going to look a bit of a bell end....well more so than usual anyway.

I think you have more chance of looking a bell end - the chances that that will be his worst performance in the next two are slim to none. He is now so slow even opponents props leave him for dead - 2 more years!!

Thats why I said If........

When have last competed with Australia when it has really mattered? Are you seriously suggesting that Kevin Sinfield is comparable to Darren Lockyer or Rob Burrow is comparable to Thurston or Roby is as good as Cameron Smith as for Billy Slater and Wellens going there would make your comments even more laughable.

A more competitive super league will only benefit the international side if the gap in quality is reduced - that is not going to happen anytime soon. So if we are to get near the Aussies the only way this will happen is if our top players mix it with the Aussies week in week out. Maybe then the gulf in quality will not be so obvious.

It's obvious why we lost. McGuire wasn't playing.

If!! do you honestly think a further two years is going to improve his game?

Great move.
Do the same for McGuire, Burrow, JJB and Bailey.

Now if Wire can give Briers, Monaghan, Carvell, Higham and Wood contract extensions it'll be job done

Well JJB has I think recently signed3 years I think,Burrow McGuire there ooc in 2013 now they are both still 29 so thats not too bad another two years why not ,Bailey is still only 28?and he usually gets a year at a time,but I think he may get a 2 year deal.We were getting told for much of last season the team was too old,so not too bothered really .

You mean don't give 2 year deals to the 29 year old Burrow and McGuire, the 28 year old Bailey and the 30 year old JJB? Couldn't agree more.

Id say Sinfield will do a hell of a lot more this year than Lockyer. But no, i dont think he is as good as Lockyer, strangely enough there are only two players in the entire world comparable to Lockyer in Marshall and Thurston, do i believe Sinfield is as good as those two? No, of course not, but then neither is any other halfback in the world. Is he comparable to the likes of Widdop? Foran? Soward? Hornby? Burns? Anasta? Id say so. Id take him ahead of Brett Finch who has had no problem getting NRL contracts yet has barely stood out over here.

Is Roby as good as Smith? probably not, but when both played in the same league the pretty much universal consensus was he was better than Buderus, who Wayne Bennett has just put forward (at 34) to retake the SoO shirt and he is comfortably better than the likes of Fein and De Gois. Is Tomkins as good as Slater, no probably not, but he is better than the likes of Perrett, Minichello, Wesser. Even if you dont think Hall or Briscoe the equal of Uate or Nightingale they are better than the likes of Vatuvai or Matt Utai who somehow still gets a gig, Colin Best is still a first grade player out there.

A more competitive SL is the only way the gap will ever be reduced, that doesnt happen by sending your best players elsewhere.

Improve...no. I am however sure that he could string a run of performances together at a higher level than witnessed tonight. Even if it is only at a slightly higher level.

Are you suggesting JP will not manage a better performance than today for the rest of the season?

Smokey - the problem is that with the best will in the world, it's hard to see SL itself ever being as strong as the NRL. There simply isn't the money or the available talent to spread across the league.

We develop the likes of Tomkins once a decade at best. In the NRL they have at least one amazing new talent come through every year, and plenty of likely contenders in almost every position. That means that when the likes of Lockyer retire, there is someone else to take over. At the moment if Tomkins is out we're down to fullbacks who would struggle to get an NRL gig.

That's why in the short-term, a few players going to the NRL can only be a good thing - they get to play against the likes of Slater every week.

We're not going to see some mass exodus of players to the NRL. The reason is that apart from forwards, where first Morley and now Ellis have proven themselves, I suspect there is severe doubt as to the quality of SL players. A number of NRL clubs would probably be interested in Ryan Hall for example, but he's not so obviously a star that they'd throw big money at him. He'd most likely have to take a big pay cut to get an NRL contract, as even Ellis did a few years ago.

No what I am saying is he is very likely to put in several worse performances than that - especially when the ground firms up and the speed of the game increases.

You have just defeated your own argument - you said the top echelons of SL players are equal to the top echelons of NRL players - then contradicted that when quoting some examples?

Then you go and compare the very best in SL with just about the very worst in the NRL?

A more competitive SL will only come from improved coaching at all levels especially junior level - we need to increase the pool of potential players coming into game and the quality of skills of those players. This will take years - in Australia RL is a huge sport with massive revenue streams - as a result their growth will always be faster than ours, the fast track to compete at international level is to get our players playing at the NRL standard every week. They would at least get access to the best conditioning and coach expertise in the game.

I havent contradicted it. You simply havent seemed to grasp what I said. I didnt say the best players in SL are the best in the world, i said the top echelons of SL are comparable to to the top echelons of the NRL. They are, they may not be the best in the world but only one player at any time is. There is no point beating ourselves up about the fact that the best players in SL arent always the best in the world. I didnt even compare them to the worst, i compared James Roby to an SoO and Australia legend, a player who has just been nominated by a coaching legend to play at what is according to the self-flagellators the highest level in RL. James Roby is a better player than him, I would say he is a better player than any NZ hooker and a better player than any Australian hooker bar Smith. Is it something we should be crying about that James Roby is only the second best hooker in the world? Not really.
Should we be upset that we arent producing a Lockyer right now? no, because Lockyer is a once in a generation player, Australia cant produce another Lockyer, Cherry-Evans wont match Lockyer and Australia havent produced a Lockyer for 20 years. The same as the Kiwis havent produced a Marshall since Marshall.
And bringing through those players in to a league whose standard is falling because the best players in SL are shifted on to the NRL will only make the improvement needed in SL more difficult and take longer.

That is true, that is what i have said, We struggle with the strength in depth part of it. We lose Tomkins we are scraping the barrell, but that doesnt mean Tomkins still wouldnt be one of the best fullbacks in the NRL. But if we shift on Tomkins, the next young FB instead of increasing the quality of SL is, at best, simply replacing what we have lost when we lose Tomkins.

Has it been confirmed anywhere that the intention is for Peacock to still be Leeds premier prop for the next 2 years, or could it simply be the case that he is getting the infamous "Leeds loyalty" contract?

We have no idea what the terms of the contract are, they could well include a second year in a purely coaching capacity only, so to speculate about what he will be like in 2 years is a little futile.

The original point was how can sending our best players to the NRL benefit the game - my opinion is we need to make the international game more competitive, having our best players being conditioned, coached and playing alongside and against the best every week can only be a positive.

Are the top players in SL comparable to the very best in NRL - not really, in the NRL there are - depending on position - 4-8 players in every position in the NRL that are better than any player in SL in the same position. If we talk about the centres it could be into double figures such is the derth of talent in SL

Roby should be better than Buderus - Buderus was well past his best when he came to Leeds - the fact he is still able to compete shows what a player he was at his peak. Roby is not as good as Issac Luke, Robbie Farah, Michael Ennis so to say he is the second best hooker in the world is a matter of conjecture not fact. He looks good in a poor league - the three I mentioned look good in a top league. It could be argued that Michael Monaghan is the best hooker in SL and not Roby

In the last 20 years the Aussies system has also produced Benji Marshall, Brad Fittler and Laurie Daley so to say Lockyer is a once in a generation player isn't quite correct. The Aussies will produce another Lockyer in the next five years.

Given the announcement of his extended contract I would suggests the odds of him still playing in two years are pretty high. Why would his contract be any different to the 3 years given to JJB?

The contract for JP could be different to the contract for JJB simply down to their age and effectiveness. Whilst both players started their top grade careers late (JP down to the age he started playing, and JJB down to injury problems at the start of his career) JP is much older and appears to be sliding down the hill much faster than JJB.

I think the announcement was down to missing Ellis tbh, if we had got Ellis then I doubt this would have been announced so early. I suspect GH thought we needed some positive news and released this news about the England Captain to try to but a better spin on a "bad news day".

In terms of what I think to the deal, 2 years is a long time in sport, and I doubt that JP will be in a position to play most weeks in his second year, assuming it is in fact a 2 year playing contract. I would have given 1 year, and then reviewed again after that. I agree with you that he looks very pedestrian at the moment.

One thing that is becoming clear is we need to bring Amor back from Wakey to cover the loss of Leuluai and the workload we are losing with Peacock in his current state.