What did you think of Charnley Friday?

Speaking of the ref today, what was our sin-binning for? Was it for repeat offending?

[iThey said on the radio[/i it was for dissent, but maybe it was for persistent fouling, which in itself would be just as bad.

I've no idea what you are alluding to here. All my comments on the game today were based upon listening to the radio commentary and nothing more. The context was clear and unambiguous all along.

Next week, I shall be passing comments after the game against Wigan on the basis of my attendance. Once again, the context is clear and unambiguous.

Burgess had been on the pitch a matter of seconds before he was back on the bench - if it was for persistent offending then Burgess was real unlucky to cop for it.

Sinbinnings are the hottest thing out of the RFL this weekend. Everybody who is anybody (oh, and Bradford) is getting at least one. We had two! See how many you can collect next weekend. You won't have a bleeding clue what they were for (even after watching the highlights of your game on The Superleague Show) but they do enhance the excitement.

His performance was disappointingly poor, much like the rest of the Wigan players on the night.

Nonetheless, my knee remained static throughout.

[url=http://loverugbyleague.com/news_5264-rhinos-second-half-stampede-too-much-for-wildcats.htmlA match report here.[/url

Keith, just so I'm clear, will the threads you post on next week only be open to people who have attended the game, rather than watched it on TV or listened on the radio?

Just want to understand the ground rules.

Did Mr and Mrs Dean really not realise that calling their son Chris would result in him having a girls name?

I expected a possessed 50's Hot Rod to come on and get the prize.

Subtle.

It's good that you're checking as Keith said you were missing the point completely a page or two back.

Good work.

How did Bailey play today?

Listened to the 2nd half and didn't hear his name once.

There are no ground rules are there? Surely all posts share the same right to be posted just as much as anyone else's, whether they've attended a game, watched it on TV from the armchair, listened to the game on the radio, or played tag for the Lost Loiners beyond the age of 10. It's a shame that some feel the need to share with us their holier-than-thou attitude to their own posts. If they wish to maintain their own sense of feigned superiority, perhaps it might be an idea for them not to be quite so dismissive of others contributions on the basis of an attendance? The same one's who pontificate about NRL standards despite never having attended a single NRL game in their life

As someone who actually listened to the whole game on the radio, I offer the following:

I didn't hear his name in the 2nd half once either.

As someone who neither attended the game or listened on the radio I make the causal observation that the return of TMFMISL and the absence of Kirke appears to have coincided with our best defensive display.

Ah, the youtube video of a certain poster kicking for goal at Shaw Cross.

Priceless.

Kettle and pot - you spout about how good Wigan and in particular Charnley were, they get exposed the following week and then you have the audacity to call others for doing exactly what you have - priceless?

If anyone on here ever got to your level of holier-than-thou then that would be a feat worth noting - don't see it happening anytime soon though do you?

I have actually been to a few NRL games live - I just don't feel the need to tell one and all.

Keep reading Noam - yet another contradiction.

BM stated in after match press conference that he only just about got through the game and that his groin injury flared up again.

He also stated that Kylie played the whole game with a tight hamstring and that Burgess will go in for a knee clear out operartion on Monday (providing we have 17 fit players for Friday,if not they'll delay the op which he was booked in for last week until Ali went lame again)

I assume Ali & Burgess will be missing for a few weeks and if Bailey's groin is an issue again then perhaps Amor will get recalled.

By the way, can anyone who attended the game pass comment on how Amor went today as it wasn't evident from the radio commentary

I don't think Amor is the answer to our present difficulties.
He didn't stand out in defense nor did he break tackles & make big metres for them.
If we lose Bailey & Kylie for a prolonged period that may alter the position.

I went mad and called him most names under the sun. Then turned to the people around me and said.. "Are you telling me i'm wrong?"



Webb should have passed to him in the original break though so they both butchered it.

I feel he is justifying my views on a pretty regular basis though so for this, I cant fault him

How has he kept a first team place in the Leeds team for the last umpteen years? Someone must be bribing the coach.

To say it was his 1st game since September I thought he went well. Certainly was strong in defence and sured us up, something we have missed recently.