Quote ="Knaresborough Rhino II"I have tried to check mine, Pet Rhino, Baby Rhino II & 3 have i missed any points TVOC?'" The first three are all OK after week 4. Baby Rhino 3 was scored as a 4 in week 2 and it should have been a 5 Prediction here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=443197&start=30 Result here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Hope that helps.

Quote ="Knaresborough Rhino II"I have tried to check mine, Pet Rhino, Baby Rhino II & 3 have i missed any points TVOC?'" The first three are all OK after week 4. Baby Rhino 3 was scored as a 4 in week 2 and it should have been a 5 Prediction here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=443197&start=30 Result here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Hope that helps.

Quote ="tvoc"The first three are all OK after week 4. Baby Rhino 3 was scored as a 4 in week 2 and it should have been a 5 Prediction here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=443197&start=30 Result here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Hope that helps.'" Cheers tvoc I'll pass the info on to Frosties

Quote ="tvoc"The first three are all OK after week 4. Baby Rhino 3 was scored as a 4 in week 2 and it should have been a 5 Prediction here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=443197&start=30 Result here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=444003 Hope that helps.'" Cheers tvoc I'll pass the info on to Frosties

Very pleased to report that someone has been busy correcting past mistakes to the end of week 4.

The following poster's totals have now been adjusted:

ennjay +4
Old Feller +1
Highbury Rhino +2
=#FF0000seniorfan -1
LFCRhino +1
Craigloiner +1
mirfieldrhino +2
rodhutch +1
Loop +1
=#FF0000tad rhino -1
=#FF0000rugbyleague88 -2
Baby Rhino 3 +1
rotherhamrhino +1
=#FF0000The Biffs Back -1
Lord Magoon +2
=#FF0000Number 2 -2

That just leaves one in need of correction up to the end of week 4. If I told you who it was you wouldn't believe me.

___________

Week 5 Results:

56 Entries

51 - OK
1 - Over-scored (=#FF0000Wheels)
4 - Under-scored

In addition to the above, one poster's total on the updated table has been under-scored despite there never being any issues with his week to week totals.

Sorry to have to inform you that your wish has now been granted.




You may want to query your Week 5 total.

Cheers

The 1 over-scored and the 4 Under-scored have been sorted.
Thanks for letting me know the mistakes.

No problem.



Saved you the trouble of informiing Frosties yourself. Glad to be of service.

Quote ="Frosties."The 1 over-scored and the 4 Under-scored have been sorted. Thanks for letting me know the mistakes.'" Just to keep everything above board the corrected posters in week 5 were: =#FF0000Wheels -1 roger_r +2 number 2 +1 tad rhino +1 SouthStander.com +1 I think we're making good progress now. There is still one incorrect score to sort from Week 3 though and as we're now almost there I'll relent on this one and say you might want to check here for the answer: leeds.rlfans.com/readarticle.php?article_id=1297 You wouldn't want to upset the webmaster now, would you? =#0000BFEdit: Now actioned SouthStander.com +2 And that will just leave the one poster whose weekly scores don't match his combined total on the table. That will then turn my spreadsheet to exclusively black entries. Don't let me down now.

Quote ="Frosties."The 1 over-scored and the 4 Under-scored have been sorted. Thanks for letting me know the mistakes.'" Just to keep everything above board the corrected posters in week 5 were: =#FF0000Wheels -1 roger_r +2 number 2 +1 tad rhino +1 SouthStander.com +1 I think we're making good progress now. There is still one incorrect score to sort from Week 3 though and as we're now almost there I'll relent on this one and say you might want to check here for the answer: leeds.rlfans.com/readarticle.php?article_id=1297 You wouldn't want to upset the webmaster now, would you? =#0000BFEdit: Now actioned SouthStander.com +2 And that will just leave the one poster whose weekly scores don't match his combined total on the table. That will then turn my spreadsheet to exclusively black entries. Don't let me down now.

Hi it wouldn't be me would it? Hope my scores are ok?

Any chance you could tell the lad and then he could just start from a correct database?

Just a thought

And thanks for helping to sort out the other problems, as I am sure the mistakes were just that, mistakes.

Hopefully the other person that is helping him check will keep the scores correct from now on.

It isn't you and your scores are just fine. Too fine if you ask me.



Not a chance. It's not rocket science. He's almost there now. If I'd just spoon fed him every week, I'd likely as not be in the same boat all season which is not where I want to be. I'd like to think 'the lad' will take a bit more care now that the mistakes have been and are going to be highlighted publically.



That's alright. I'm also fairly sure that the other mistakes were just that also but at the end of the day there is kudos and/or prizes on offer and it's only fair that mistakes are not allowed to tarnish the result.



When does he start?

The Week 6 results are now in and he's gone and done it again.

This week's Top Tipster is [size=200Gotcha [/sizewith a monster 8

One of the very few to tip Bradford to beat the rampant Warriors. He was also one of the very few who fancied Hull KR to down the Saints and better than that by the exact margin thanks to Fisher's 78th minute winning try and Dobson's goal. It obviously pays to be different.

I tried to be different and subsequently failed!

I noticed that ..... not that I faired much better.

tomhutch is missing from the above, although you've picked up his total in the updated table, so just an oversight that doesn't effect anything important.




Which just leaves the error on the table compilation from Week 5. As you didn't correct it then it's still a problem after this week.

Other than that nothing to report as far as I can see.
52 entries - All scored correctly

The scrutiny is working. Keep it up.

Bottom of the weekly league. I'll settle for that. G. Quagmire though, he's laughing to the Chapel of Rest as we speak.

It takes a special effort to finish top (all alone) or bottom (all alone) and people should respect that.

Many thanks for the respect.



I dont aim to replicate this again this season though

The Week 7 (SL Round 6) results are now in.

This week's Top Tipster is [size=200rhinos 69[/size with a splendid 8

How did he rise above the pack this week? Ben Jones-Bishop's last minute try for the Harlequins (with the missed conversion) giving him the bonus two points for a correctly predicted margin.

For the second week running one poster stood alone at the top (with a score of 8 ) and one at the bottom (with a score of 2) the 'honour' going to deanos rhinos who has now done both. Top in week 2 bottom in week 7.

Week 7 - No issues. Just the mistake that occurred in this week still to correct. viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162

Week 7 - No issues. Just the mistake that occurred in this week still to correct. viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162

The Week 8 (SL Round 7) results are now in.

This week's Top Tipster is [size=200JMT[/size with an incredible [size=20011[/size

How did they rise above the pack this week? Basically by correctly predicting the result and margin in 3 of the 7 fixtures.

The next three all had very good totals as well this week: LS16_Rhino 10, Clearwing and Hopie both with 9.

This week's boobie prize belongs to =#FF0000billie joes red hair with a 3

There again there were some notable absentees who missed entering their predictions altogether, Abbott Out for the first time and for the second week running Inflatable_Armadillo.

Bernadette Gill was the only entrant to get all 7 winners correct with Leeds scuppering all but 5 of this week's 53 entries chances.

Week 8 Results - 53 entries 51 - OK 2 - Under-scored And there is now a second instance where: Last week's total + this week's score doesn't equal this week's total The previous instance occurred in Week 5 and still remains uncorrected. Take the table from the opening post on here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=445970 Add the weekly totals from here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162 And you should discover that a respected poster is missing 2 points This week's table error is different though in that the poster concerned has gained 2 points he isn't entitled to: Quote ="Frosties." =#FF00005 Points – Finglas , RhinoNeil, Pokerface, Glenn Quagmire, Craigloiner, LFCRhino, Highbury Rhino, Gotcha, TVOC, =#FF0000RugbyLeague88 , Foxy Rhino, Knaresborough Rhino II , The Joker, Sibbs Rhinos The table is as follows: =#FF000033 - TVOC, =#FF0000rugbyleague88, wilderspool memories -----------------------------------------------'" RugbyLeague88 had 26 points carried forward + this week's 5 = 31 (not 33)

Week 8 Results - 53 entries 51 - OK 2 - Under-scored And there is now a second instance where: Last week's total + this week's score doesn't equal this week's total The previous instance occurred in Week 5 and still remains uncorrected. Take the table from the opening post on here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=445970 Add the weekly totals from here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162 And you should discover that a respected poster is missing 2 points This week's table error is different though in that the poster concerned has gained 2 points he isn't entitled to: Quote ="Frosties." =#FF00005 Points – Finglas , RhinoNeil, Pokerface, Glenn Quagmire, Craigloiner, LFCRhino, Highbury Rhino, Gotcha, TVOC, =#FF0000RugbyLeague88 , Foxy Rhino, Knaresborough Rhino II , The Joker, Sibbs Rhinos The table is as follows: =#FF000033 - TVOC, =#FF0000rugbyleague88, wilderspool memories -----------------------------------------------'" RugbyLeague88 had 26 points carried forward + this week's 5 = 31 (not 33)

Quote ="tvoc"Week 8 Results - 53 entries 51 - OK 2 - Under-scored '" Changes made to Steve Slippery Morris and Mike Gledhill (moving them to 8 points). Quote ="tvoc"Last week's total + this week's score doesn't equal this week's total The previous instance occurred in Week 5 and still remains uncorrected. Take the table from the opening post on here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=445970 Add the weekly totals from here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162 And you should discover that a respected poster is missing 2 points'" Done. Given Gotcha 2 more points. Quote This week's table error is different though in that the poster concerned has gained 2 points he isn't entitled to: RugbyLeague88 had 26 points carried forward + this week's 5 = 31 (not 33)'" Given RL88 7 on my database whereas having the right score of 5, now changed.

Quote ="tvoc"Week 8 Results - 53 entries 51 - OK 2 - Under-scored '" Changes made to Steve Slippery Morris and Mike Gledhill (moving them to 8 points). Quote ="tvoc"Last week's total + this week's score doesn't equal this week's total The previous instance occurred in Week 5 and still remains uncorrected. Take the table from the opening post on here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=445970 Add the weekly totals from here: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=447162 And you should discover that a respected poster is missing 2 points'" Done. Given Gotcha 2 more points. Quote This week's table error is different though in that the poster concerned has gained 2 points he isn't entitled to: RugbyLeague88 had 26 points carried forward + this week's 5 = 31 (not 33)'" Given RL88 7 on my database whereas having the right score of 5, now changed.

What was that, I didn't quite catch it, I think I'm going a bit mutton jeff..... thank you. No, don't mention it.



Now all you've got to do is correct the table (with edit number 5) and you've cracked it for another week.

I'm glad tipping Leeds even when I expect them to lose isn't costing me too much, will that policy last until the end of the week?

Glad I told you how to score this comp, means i don't have to check my totals anymore

I'll never back against Leeds (just as a matter of principal) but I'm seriously considering opting for a draw this week.



It's giving me a bleeding headache I can tell you. Totaling everybodies score for my own spreadsheet (that's the easy part), challenging the administrator to make the corrections is where it does me head in.