personally wouldnt have an issue with that. One pro player that i wouldnt be worried about!

Internet warrior alert...

Two props having a difference of opinion is not now (and never has been) a reason to send anyone off.

Peacock went over the shoulder, Perry didn't like it pushed Peacock after the play the ball (therefore first offence was by Perry) Peacock reacted and the rest is history.

Deserving of a double sin-binning yes but that's all, IMO.

Bloody hell I would, especially when I wasn't looking.

I enjoyed the Peacocks rumble in the jungle.

It reminded my of the State Of Origin game from the 80's where opposite numbers would just 'have a go' with each other. They both seemed keen to do so.

Good fight. But it was foolish for Peacock to get sucked into it. They fell into a huge bear trap. Even though both teams were down to 12, I knew who were going to take advantage of the space. Leeds leaked 2 trys in the first half, and they were both leaked when we were down to 12. They were cutting holes through our defence anyway, so the extra space was only going to result in trys conceeded. Not our brightest moment.

Perry did swing a lame effort at Peacock that was just off the main camera angle, and Peacock threw one back that was less lame. This sort of thing is far less harmful than swinging arms and elbows in the tackle.
Great entertainment and both players probably enjoyed it too.

Where was the gap for Manly's first try. Stewart didn't need a gap as he shrugged off four Leeds defenders all stood within touching distance.

The Watmough try (from the cleverly worked forward pass) followed a penalty awarded against Ablett on Matai for what exactly?

Genuine question I've no idea what that was all about.

Why exactly? What am I supposed to do? Ring you up to give you my thoughts on Ryan Bailey? Come down to Leeds and walk around the city with a loud speaker?

Not being a nob and pretending to be hard online might be a start...

yeah whilst peacock had there No 9 on his back

Where have I done that exactly? I clearly just stated that Ryan Bailey wouldnt be someone I would be worried about unlike most players who I am the first to admit would rather not fight with.

Internet Warrior just can't help it can you...

why would you not be bothered about him? Surely if you are not afraid of him, and don't think he could hurt you, then the professional rugby league players should be able to take the niggles and high tackles as he is so soft he would have no impact on them.

Or are you harder than most Pro RL players?

Behind his monitor he is...

Er... they can. When have you ever seen Bailey get the better of anyone?

Depends on how you mean. He's got a better set of SL medals than most of the saints team.

He got the better of a number of players in last weeks game against KR, again something not many saints players did this week.

Would you like me to arrange a meeting with him for you then?

Ask Adrian Morley - not been the same player since Bailey laid him out last season.

What makes you think you could!

What makes you think he couldn't?

Thats why I was asking.

Both tries involved Lauitiiti reaching out with lazy arm tackles, the one on Stewart being particularly poor. The break by Watmough which Stewart bombed also came down the same channel.

He may have looked impressive with ball in hand second half, but it's an understatement to say he owed Leeds it for some shocking first half efforts.

That's rich coming from someone who, a couple of posts ago, confused effective and affective! In case you don't understand, you should have used effective, not affective.

Calm yourself and I'm not a scouser.