League Express reporting Hudds have made a bid for Brierley!

Well he didn't make the 17 today with Chase and Ridyard preferred, if that continues and along with Rowley's departure then he's not going to stay regardless where he ends up going.

Maybe Leeds can loan him to Huddersfield this year before he moves to the Rhinos for the 2017 season.

Always better from the horses mouth..

Shouldn't he already be playing for us seen as Leigh didn't get promoted last season

Leeds should be in for him, its now or never.

A season with Chase, Hock-on and their cronies will not do him any favours.

Last I heard was Hudds had a couple of bids rejected, Leigh clearly don't want to let him go.

A COUPLE of bids, surely after Hudds' first bid Leigh should've informed them that he's already signed for Leeds and is merely on loan there

Maybe Leeds can loan him to Huddersfield this year before he moves to the Rhinos for the 2017 season.



HTH x

Already said that mate.

Leigh have no need to sell, they can bend any potential purchasers over a barrel.

Is this because you now live in a stable?

I seem to recall you bet you house on him becoming a Leeds player if Leigh did not get promoted last season

And if you look back I also given a latest update after that stating that it had changed.

Isn't it funny, why would Huddersfield need to bid for Brierley when the clause in his contract states he can now in effect leave the club? There would be no need to bid, obviously a lot more is involved in this, as I have previously stated.

Leighs chairman has publicly stated that the clause allowing Brierley to leave is illegal and cannot be enforced.

As a matter of course all player registrations are held by the RFL, aren't they? So even if Brierley were to walk he couldn't just turn out for another team unless Leigh decided not to contest it.

Been told Brierley is going to sign for Leeds & Sutcliffe going to spend the season at Fev

Hey ho! Here we go



Im sure Sutcliffe will be extemely happy with that

But wasn't blindly believing "the horse's mouth" the reason you gambled away your house?
And knowing now that your predicted done deal was no such thing why believe Mr Ed again now?

With the injuries we are getting recently there is more chance of:

6 Lilley
7 Brierley
9 Burrow
13 Sutcliffe

With Falloon coming off the bench.

Good idea lets play sutcliffe at 13, in fact he can play against Jason Taumalolo this week, its not like the 3 stone difference is gonna matter in a position that is basically a quicker or more skillful prop

Sinfield wasn't the biggest player and he played 13 for quite some time...

He was a bit bigger when he played 13 every game if you remember, he struggled a bit when he played there last year
Also when he played 13 we basically just played with 3 halves, which is why in many big games burrow or Mcguire would start on the bench so our forwards could get a roll on
the roll of 13 is completely different now, if we were to play Sutcliffe there we would need 3 props on the bench plus a big second row to stop the opposition getting a roll on
For me our best starting 13 option is Singleton- basically a prop with quick feet

Times have changed re the loose forward position. Especially if we're playing Burrow at hooker, we can't have 4 halves defending at the same time. When we had Sinfield at 13 we had Diskin at 9 most of the time doing some cracking defensive work.

Why would Hudds be trying to negotiate with Leigh anyways? You said he was a Leeds player now and was merely on loan at Leigh this year so surely they should be asking us not Leigh.

Because deals with other clubs are not known about, just like when Leeds went in for Clark even though he'd already agreed to go to Warrington. Things are put in place and not public knowledge.