Potentially banning Wilkin



Was looking forward to taking part in the "Wilkin Dummy Spit sweepstake" on Friday

Gutted

No potentially about it, would be incredibly surprised if he didn't get 2 games ...

That bad? Not seen it yet

Silly is the best way to describe it - but given his previous, there ain't a snowball in yells chance he'll escape without a ban, and most probably get the 2

What did he do?

The most despicable thing ever ever ever if you believe the Wakefield fans.

A late hit if your a real person. Saints should hire whoever got Bowen off ...

Amor maybe banned as well, but he has the EGP option so may get away with it. www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... rs-charged

Amor maybe banned as well, but he has the EGP option so may get away with it. www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... rs-charged

Hope Ganson wont be making any unscheduled visits to the Refs dressing room at half time.

With EGP Amor will be banned for one game, you get the lower end of the charge..

Wilkin is two faced. Remember this: www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/o ... rand-final from Mr Morality. I hope the dirty cheap shot merchant plays on Friday............

Wilkin is two faced. Remember this: www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/o ... rand-final from Mr Morality. I hope the dirty cheap shot merchant plays on Friday............

Having watched SL Full Time, I'm surprise Amor has only been charged with a grade B - reckless.

To me, it looked like a deliberate attempt to 'get back' at a player who he took exception to after being pushed from an offside position. Not so much reckless but more "deliberate attempt at revenge".

Taken an EGP, gets a one game ban therefore misses Friday.

That'll hurt Kleenex and hand lotion sales amongst the Southstander massive.

No problem , Wellens is the newly installed favourite

I can't remember as it's been soooo long, the last time I'd read from anyone on here that we should've kept Amor.

Quote ="thebloodbath"Wilkin is two faced. Remember this: www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/o ... rand-final from Mr Morality. I hope the dirty cheap shot merchant plays on Friday............'" How does it make Wilkin two-faced? His problem with Bailey was to do with how he reacted after a Grand Final win.

Quote ="thebloodbath"Wilkin is two faced. Remember this: www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/o ... rand-final from Mr Morality. I hope the dirty cheap shot merchant plays on Friday............'" How does it make Wilkin two-faced? His problem with Bailey was to do with how he reacted after a Grand Final win.

I think the Wakey fans issue us mainly about Roby's whole performance and Saint Steve Ganson visting the ref's dressing room at half-time (which was confirmed by the MC) where he then gave Roby a dressing down (rumoured only... but on good authority) over his first half performance. Wakey then conceded 3 try's off the back of six consecutive penalties, had Ali placed on report for an incident that was nothing more than Lomax falling over & two Saints players, neither placed on report and one incident not even penalised, which lead to two of their players receiving 1 and two match bans after the game... and if it wasn't for Amor's EGP, then it would have probably been 2 games! Oh, then only losing by 8 points in a relegation season... I think they might have a point... maybe not proof of a conspiracy, but certainly what appears to be poor judgement by Steve & at just plain poor ref'ing!

He's Steve Ganson ... he does what he wants.

Wilkin moaned like a little bitch about Baileys on and off field antics.

Yet Wilkin isn't whiter than white with his on field behaviour. Ranging from dangerous lifts, high tackles, shoulder charges and dangerous contact with joints and that is just over last season or so.

In short - hypocrite.

All those pointless ref cam shots we have to put up with were forgiven for capturing Wilkin hissy-fitting to the ref last year at Headingley.

Not really, unless you don't understand the terms "hypocrite" and "two-faced."

Wilkin gave the opinion that Bailey reacted badly to the Grand Final victory, that was the basis to their feud. Wilkin has received one or two fans for foul play. The two things aren't related at all and Wilkin, whilst guilty of many things, isn't guilty of hypocrisy.

Priceless.

We could change it to a "how many times will Eddie tell us Saints are depleted" competition.

I'll start the bidding at 27.

It seems Neil Hudgell is nearly as annoyed with the RFL as Lawrie: www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/26748682 Although he'd be better if he just came out and said what was on his mind and stopped holding it all in like this.

It seems Neil Hudgell is nearly as annoyed with the RFL as Lawrie: www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/26748682 Although he'd be better if he just came out and said what was on his mind and stopped holding it all in like this.

probably only because he hasn't had the opportunity in a good long while