Quote ="William Eve"I wasn't aware the legal process had progressed that far in American Football. I think the key point which many forget is that employers have a duty of care towards their employees as well as providing a safe working environment. This is where it gets tricky in contact sports. How do you provide a safe working environment? I guess they can only be made safer.
Often in sport, we've seen cases of career-ending injuries legally dealt with on an individual basis. In other words, injured party A sues individual B responsible for injury. The sports governing bodies and their clubs themselves (employers) have been getting away with it for far too long. It's time they took more responsibility.'"
Us older fans who say "bring back the biff" and even current fans who bemoan the outlawing of the shoulder charge would do well to pause and reflect upon this.
The NFL has introduced plenty of rule changes which have been massively unpopular with the fans, who complain it is softening the game. But they have had no choice but to do so.
You might find this interesting reading. The NFL is slightly different because the helmet, although design as protection, may actual cause more damage as contact with the head wasn't, and still isn't in some cases, automatically illegal. Nevertheless, the denial of the issue and the macho "shake it off" mantra clearly still applies to rugby league, if Hoihia's account is to be believed.
[urlhttp://www.rd.com/health/conditions/mike-webster-brain-injury/[/url