Quote ="Ferdy"Don't think you can have it both ways. At the risk of turning this into another Kirke/Bailey thread I don't see how we can dismiss Kirkes contribution as piggy backing on the success of others then claim Bailey had a huge part in the last decade. Let's be honest Bailey is Marganally better player but both are pretty ordinary squad filler'"
I pretty much agree with you on the whole and both are currently no more than dispensable squad fillers for sure.I would argue though that Bailey still deserves to be classed amongst the golden generation due to his early years(2003-2005) when he certainly brought plenty to the table for us, he represented GB,was a key forward for us for a brief time and looked like he would kick on to be an excellent front rower for many years.The fact he hasn't done so is purely down to him and his attitude.Bailey is by far the better player of the two imo, and its so frustrating that we only get to see him showcase it a handful of times a year if we are lucky these days because he is still capable.The fact he is even being put in the same category as a player as mediocre as Kirke is damning in itself imo.