Quote ="tvoc"I've always thought entertaining rugby can also be winning rugby so don't view the two as being mutually exclusive.
That would depend largely on revenue exceeding costs. I'd expect entertaining winning rugby would be an easier sell than dour winning rugby.'"
Hence why TVOC I put entertaining and win naf all.
Of course I would love to see us entertain and win something.
But it does not always follow, ask St Helens.
In an ideal world that would be nice.
But if we continue to get to finals and dare I say win the odd one or two. That will keep GH happy and consequently it will keep McD in a job.
Rugby is a business (sadly) these days and if we aint getting to finals we aint going to have any cash to pay our players, ask Bradford Bulls