That puzzled me when the teams were announced - and could be symptomatic of coaching deficiencies.

The performance was much improved on the Quins game I witnessed and I thought at the 55-60 min mark we would kick on and secure the victory rather than ship 30 points.

I think Tad summed it up perfectly - a little bit of thought and a little less of stupidity is needed. Throwing the ball around does make it entertaining, but surely that has to be done on the back of rock solid defence.

Me neither but then again I'm exceedingly thick.

With 20 mins to go Leeds had the momentum! Leeds could have/should have gone on to win. Leeds were on a role, Watkins give a penalty away whilst in possession(perhaps the biggest no no in rl) and that killed the role! We were under the pump from that when you should have been working the ball out of your own half. we let saints back in to a game we had got on top of. Saints were the better team as they got the job done. Leeds let a lead slip. One more score at 16-12 and Leeds IMO would have stood a much better chance of taking the points. We were in a position to do that but killed our own momentum with school boy errors.

Take nothing from saints best team won.

I thought the turning point came when silverwood found yet another way to do us with the Absurd 'knock on' against jjb.

Roll or "Role" ?? Would that be the role of acting like a team that knows what it's doing ?

Did somebody mention cake?