Hetherington didn't push for a fee.

In the article it says GH would've considered [ieither [/ipushing for a fee or putting Pratt in the 20 man squad but Pratt taking the matter to a tribunal brought the whole thing to a head.

I noted that on this article, but I don't know whether he made a claim stating he wanted a fee previous to this. My guess would be that he did. He would have been aware of the bulls sniffing around and would have probably fired a warning across their bows saying he's contracted to us and we want a fee, otherwise Pratt wouldn't have needed to go to a tribunal to get his contract cancelled.

i've already been put in my place by TVOC once, I don't intend to supply him with further ammunition even if you want to. Whether TVOC (or others) has kept his powder dry to use that ammunition I shall wait on with anticipation

Come on Finglas, you have to go balls out. Say it with enough conviction and people will beleive it to be true.

Except that pesky TVOC. I could have gotten away with loads if it wasn't for that pesky TVOC.

You are Hetherington and I claim my €5 oops £5.

On second thoughts you're in the legal profession (so you tell everyone), you argue till the death and convince many to agree with you whilst alienating opposition opinion only to be found out by the mild mannered TVOC. You are Caisley and TVOC is Hetherington and I now claim £10

Shouldn't that be "meddling" ?