According to Yorkshire Post. Any implications for the Rhinos ?

I never said any loans had taken place - just suggested that it was possible from one of the "profitable" companies in the group which could/would put a strain on the lenders company.Do you dispute the Union side make losses ?

I dont quite see what your point is?

I can't be bothered to go through the thread again,but I believe it was mentioned if the Rhinos were holding back on spending the cap limit because of the costs of Leeds Carnegie.I was merely pointing out this was a possibility because of the amount of funding the Union would require to be competitive - far much more money than last time.

Actually it was only you who mentioned this. No-one else did. Plus you've already admitted there is no evidence of the Rhinos funding Carnegie.
Caddick may be funding Carnegie, but does that really have a negative effect on the Rhinos? I doubt it and there is no evidence of that whatsoever.
Why would it cost the Union team more than the last time they were in the Premiership?

the club will now revert to being the Leeds Tykes, as the GP has a ban on sponsors names (which is all Carnegie is).

Tykes average crowds in 07-8 were in the region of 7k, which is part of a consistent increase over the last few years. With Back & Key in charge, the signings seem to be being made (lock from Leicester & back rower from Bristol) so far to keep us up.

There's also a hardcore of honest GP level pros in the current side, such as MacDonald, Rawlinson, Murphy, Fourie, Barrow & Hinton. It simply remains for the attraction of a few extras in key areas-Chris Whittaker and Henry Fa'afili have been mentioned-and I'm confident leeds (now by agreement the fittest side in the GP due to Backy's conditioning regime) will stay up. Especially as Newcastle look so shocking.