I wasn't at the game but watched it on telly and you certainly can add it to the list. I don't recall anybody on here having an issue with it.

Great post, and great stuff from Ryan last night too



more of the same please!

it was a decent hit, nothing more, sometimes when a players back is turned and they have 'relaxed' having passed the ball, they are a bit more succeptable to a hit, i think that is what happened in this instance.

Oh I had a wonderful "conversation" with a few Leeds supporters about it. But that proves the point you are making. It is across the board where one of "our" players gets hit hard there is a tendency to see foul play that does not exist. Rovers are no better in this regard than anyone else I might add.

Whilst at the game, there appeared to be question marks about the hit when witnessed first hand, something that the first 2 replays on the big screen didn't alter. At that point, it looked like a late hit, possibly with a leading elbow and/or a high shot.

However, once the replay from behind the posts had been shown, it was quite clear there was nothing really wrong with the tackle. Maybe a fraction late, but nothing to get excited about.

Bill is right in saying that some Leeds fans couldn't take in what their eyes were showing them and continued to demand Briscoe be sent off.