brian mac has been fined for his comments made after the catalans game regarding the penalty counts etc www1.skysports.com/rugby-union/n ... l-comments freedom of speech eh? the truth clearly must have hit a raw nerve i guess

brian mac has been fined for his comments made after the catalans game regarding the penalty counts etc www1.skysports.com/rugby-union/n ... l-comments freedom of speech eh? the truth clearly must have hit a raw nerve i guess

Hardly surprising.

in more detail here www.therhinos.co.uk/news/20218.php#.UW0tp6LwlfY

in more detail here www.therhinos.co.uk/news/20218.php#.UW0tp6LwlfY

I didn't hear where he critisized the ref in that interview. In fact he was quite specific, as he was in the media before the game, that his complaint was about how consistently Catalans are awarded the penalty count. There was no mention of Thaler in his interview.

I would challenge it if I was him.

couldn't agree more gotcha and like i said the truth obviously hurt,although they have now again brought the matter back out into the open and whereby future catalans home games will be under close scrutiny,i wonder if this pattern of the dragons winning penalty counts will suddenly stop?

I think those rules are reasonably clear, and I think he breached them.

I like Brian Mac, but I dodn't think that was one of his better moments. There are channels for discussing refereeing, and I don't like coaches doing it in the media. Not very professional, and not very dignified. I generally find Brian Mac's media appearances contain plenty of both professionalism and dignity (no idea what he does with the rest of his life, I don't see it) and I was a bit disappointed when I read that.

No objection to the fine.

Citing "freedom of speech" is utter bilge and over-sensationalism. We have free speech in this country. He will face no criminal action for this. Professional bodies and other organisations in all sectors have operational rules regarding conduct with the press and so forth.

Agred. I though Brian was just about guarded enough. Didn't he pose questions rather than make statements?

It's not like he out and out called the ref an offensive name like Nathan Brown did at the weekend.

This explains the ridiculously heavy-handed punishment that Bailey received after the Cats game.

The RFL were obviously PO'd with Mac's post match comments.

More to do with flexing their muscles over the newly-outlawed shoulder charge I suspect. First really obvious example of it in a televised game. Excessive, but not, perhaps, surprising.

He could be duplicating the sir Alex ferguson theme of all the world and officialdom is unjustly against us. Thus creating a siege mentality .

The fact remains that being a super league referee is one of the most protected jobs in modern society.

If i had a job where i was completely unaccountable for my actions and, more over, people were fined for daring to raise a question over my performance, I'd be laughing.

Not surprised once again the RFL have responded to FACTS getting mentioned in the public domain by fining Mc because their officials are shown to be inconsistent AGAIN.
I think it's time the CEO's ,Coaches and the RFL with their Officials got round the table and had this out it's ridiculous it changes every week and still inept performance holds no repurcussions whatsoever.
Form the Officials side of things i honestly hope Ganson can have a positive impact but from the Disciplinary side fo things it needs sorting asap it's a real black spot within our game imo.