Both (receivers) feet have to be behind the kicker to be onside.

Someone should inform the Aussie ref.

Its ok



Its a week ago, you can let go now

FFS



There was nothing wrong with that last week. Get over it.

Also they only have to be level.

When the kicker is kicking the ball on a drop out, do they have to be behind the line?

As long as they are level with the ball then they are onside.

Its a valid question FFS



then why does the ref shout BEHIND the kicker at the kickoffs ????

It wasnt a question, it was a statement aimed at Robinson last week.

I say that every KO too. Its just so they dont creep up. If you tell them to stay behind the kicker they drop back a meter or 2 and by the time the ball is kicked they are normally bang on the line.

And if i took a quid off every person who i have heard blame a referee in RL for no reason i would be a millionaire by now.
Rules are rules players know them so do referees they dont make them up as they go along.

Phil does have his moments and his club loyalties, but he backs British every time and his comments during the replay of Peacock's scuffle were priceless..



Off topic a bit but I watched the game again yesterday and for those who were gloating that Peacock only got atn Perry when he was being held by Leeds players obviously were unaware that Peacock had the Manly number 6 clinging to him for most of the fight.

Somehow I just know for certain that will come back and bite your @rse.

I will say just one word...Ganson.

What rules has Ganson made up?

I think you should just walk away from the game personally. Someone with that much paranoia should seek help. We dont need people like you anyway.