i cant believe what people are saying. watch the tackle again, and keep an eye on gilmour's left forearm why he has made connection with JW jaw when he does'nt have the ball is dirty. JW was out before he hit the ground and gilmour didnt go for the ball he just swung at JW head. I cant believe people can argue with what is right in front of you. slow it down its BAD!!

and that matters because???

At least it's not just me seeing things then



High, late and dangerous - surely that's a ban?

Have not seen the tacke yet if it is a haed shot I cast my mind back to ben westwood Wire v Catalan he got 5 games for the head shot that knocked dane carlaw clean out

Would have to be similar or more if a bad one.

Hope he is ok,,Get well soon mate.

I've just seen it on Sky Sports News and it was just a standard tackle from Gilmour.

Best wishes to Joe in his recovery.

And needless to say, I beg to differ.

Still, I'm not gonna argue over it as it's all futile in the context of things. I've made my views known and I'll leave it to the RFL to decide whether punishment is warranted or not.

i hope the lad is ok,get well soon Joe

Standard? if that was a standard tackle for Gilmour he would never play, a swinging arm hitting a players chin is a penalty, a late high tackle is a sending off, so he deserves 3 games at the very least.

standard tackles dont hit jaw high! and it was so late that the players didnt even notice that joe was in trouble and carried on playing!!

It wasn't a swinging arm or a high tackle. If the injury hadn't have happened, I doubt it would even be mentioned. It was just unfortunate that Westerman picked up an injury of some sorts.

Dont quite think you know what your on about cockles..

Give over, the impact was absolutely nothing. It was the floor that hurt him, which could happen in any incident where someone falls to the floor in a game. As Cas' coach suggested, it's just one of those things that happens from time to time in impact sports. Fortunately it appears Joe Westerman is okay, that is the main thing.

Absolute bollox, take off your tinted specs.

Matterson has admitted on your club website that it was a nothing incident.

I don't think that guy ("not again"icon_wink.gif is a Cas fan?

Maybe because he would probably get fined by the RFL if he said "it was a shocking tackle" or "dangerous play by Saints"?

No, not really, if he just isolates the one incident and explains his reasoning then I would imagine he'd be fine, however, if he had gone off on one a la morgan the other week thats when you find yourself in trouble.

I'm sure the RFL will look in to the incident and make a decision on whether Gilmour has a case to answer

I think that was just a gesture.
Lets be honest there werent one player on the cas side deserved MOM.

pro RL players have to much respect for each other for it to be malicious , i have yet to see it . clumsy maybe but doesn't sound like gilmours style of play to me.

I know. The gesture was well placed. Probably just me trying to misplace a gag in the wrong time

Sorry i'm a very fair person as views go but that was a disgrace. Anyone who disagrees with me should look at it with a beatuiful thing called sky plus and slow it down, Gilmour is looking straight at his head and takes him out. He didn't look at the ball and i'm sorry thats a ban.

Hope he's OK and back for you very soon.

Hope Joe makes a full recovery.

Absolutely nothing in the tackle though, can't believe some people are so drunk on their emotions that they would even consider that it warrants a ban.

Lee Gilmour CLEARLY looks at westy before going for his head.

Is that legal ?

Thought not.