How was he banned and Senior wanst??? What a joke....

Probably because of previous form.

Because leeds players sit on the panel, and yes what a joke

Makes a mockery of the disciplinary committee. The 'top' teams are treated differently.

AND THERE IT IS!

The disciplinary panel is an absolute farce, Leeds could make a fortune if they ever decide to publish the photos they obviously must have of Richard Lewis riding bareback on Neil Wood whilst wearing only a Wimbledon sun visor and spanking Woods booty with a tennis racket....

I should imagine the club might try an appeal.

I thought Senior was lucky to not get a ban but McGoldrick's was because of his past record and it's not surprising.

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php?player=McGoldrick&club=&from_day=&from_month=&from_year=&to_day=&to_month=&to_year=&league=&charged=&search=search[/url

Webb was banned for too matches for far less than Senior's or McGoldrick's before we all jump on the anti Leeds wagon.

It'd fail and he'd get another game for the temerity of appealing.

Fair enough, I'll just jump on the anti Senior band wagon, the ugly, bald headed, forward passing, BJM jaw breaking freak.

He pleaded guilty, and with two warning letters already, I can't see any grounds for appeal.

That's fine, you crack on lad

It's a fair enough punishment considering McGoldricks poor disciplinary record and attitude.
Wreckless kicking out in the tackle needs to be dealt with.
No excuse in McGoldricks case but i do understand frustration at laying on when players just want a quick play the ball, however thats a whole new topic.

You forgot un-professional, unfaithful cougar banger and soul-less, dead-eyed, greed, disrespectful e-bay mercenary.

But enough of his better characteristics.

Pleaded guilty but he got a penalty given against him. A fine should be sufficient for me.

Appealed: www.castigers.com/article.php?id=816

Appealed: www.castigers.com/article.php?id=816

Quote ="Fully"Appealed: www.castigers.com/article.php?id=816'" And to be fair quite right! I fail to see how one week its deemed a pen and fine next weeks its a ban! Incidents should be taken on their merit not what hes done before! I thought Senior should have got 10 mins and so should McGoldrick! But its the RFL after all and inconsistancy is their biggest trait!

Quote ="Fully"Appealed: www.castigers.com/article.php?id=816'" And to be fair quite right! I fail to see how one week its deemed a pen and fine next weeks its a ban! Incidents should be taken on their merit not what hes done before! I thought Senior should have got 10 mins and so should McGoldrick! But its the RFL after all and inconsistancy is their biggest trait!

The ban will be upheld.

Is that fact or opinion?

Lost his appeal and also ordered to pay a further £200 costs for the hearing

The Trouble was obviously Goldy's previous visits to the waste of space that is the inconsistant RFL disciplinary panal and if you read what the idiots said when they gave senior his fine,which was:

[i"The committee has accepted what you have said and agrees that incidents like this are rife but this does not make it right. We do not feel a suspension is appropriate in this respect but will mark this with a fine to serve notice to other players that this has the potential for serious injury."[/i

To do it the week after this was always going to be a ban

Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)

Opinion.