And what did your lot promise when you got promoted to SL in 1998?

??

But how many of those will be in your first team next season? Not many judging by the amount of Australian and foreign players you'll have in your side.

which we have also been in the last 5 years.

Actually (significantly) higher crowds and better income are two things.

And as for the rest havent you been telling us that you 'would be leaving us behind in a few weeks' (or words to that effect) for months now

prove the income!

over the last 5 years i doubt it.
you run at loss, so do we but not to the degree you do, read your own forums and you will see that people in the know on cas are not too happy with how your piggy bank is being run!

WAKEFIELD ARE THE BETTER SIDE.






END OF.
(literally for me cos i can't be d)

Each to their own but it it clear that Castleford have been superior for the majority of the last decade.

yes both teams run at a loss, like most rl teams do, yours has just had a big cash injection from selling your ground, but that money wont last for ever, especially when your only pulling in the support that you do. The big concern for wakefield has to be not only can they get a new ground but how many are going to travel to an out of town stadium when they are really struggling to pull in crowds to a ground in the city? I mean you've had your best ever sl season and crowds have been dangerously low (even when you've been putting money in for offers and x factor/pop idol/ britains got talent or whatever singers to play/sing before hand) if you have a bad season next year you could be in real trouble. Hopefully wakefield will get there new ground and somehow manage to increase crowds even though the ground will be out of town, though both those things are going to be difficult.

Oh you wont be gone for long, you obsess about us far too much for that

2 relegations and a wooden spoon who are you trying to kid.

Nobody loves a quitter...

Typo corrected..

so we've missed two years of super league and you've missed how many?

In the last decade you tell me.

Wakefield missed the first 3 seasons of SL, the first season was out of our control, after we was evicted from the SL project in a act of gross injustice.

Castleford have missed 2 seasons of SL due to not been able to cut it on the field. Two embarrassing relegations, on both occasions the fatal blow coming from Wakefield.

You also have to consider Castleford great fortune in staying in SL. If the franchise system hadn't been introduced Cas would of been relegated last season, which imo would of been justice. You should be punished not rewarded for having such an uncompetitive season.

A change in the rules for play off qualifying also benefited Cas, any other year a 8th place finish would got you jack!

Wakefield are a better club, deal with it!

Are we still on for that November start date for the construction of the stadium Gaslight? You were certainly doing some spouting on here a few months ago about it. Time to wake up and face reality buddy!

So the fact you were outside the division was an injustice but for Cas it was down to us? The fact you weren't considered was because you were to put it plain and simply - sh*t.

You know for a fact that 2007 gave us the opportunity to blood the youngsters...where are yours? Apart from Ferguson you've not produced one first-choice first teamer during the last two years? Also, had relegation been in place in 2007 you would have seen a completely different Cas team. Stop talking crap.

Huddersfield have three wooden spoons, what's your point? In all reality, they should have been relegated too but they were saved by crap teams in the division below.

The fact we got promoted at the first attempt both times shows we don't deserve to be in NL1.

Cas had their own destiny in their own hands. Finish bottom (excluding Catalans) and you go down. Everybody knew this the rules were set and everyone knew the score.

If you know anything about Rugby League you would know what happened regarding the introduction of SL. I'm not going to make up for your lack of knowledge by posting what would be a long winded explanation.

Right bitchfight on here innit



So what are they going to do , drop 1 , drop 2 , drop none nad bring 2 up ?

So was it not Wakefield's fault they weren't included in SL, even if partly? Do Keighley and Widnes not have more of a claim to be aggrieved? Take off those blue, white and red glasses and see that Wakefield's destiny, like Castleford's, is in their own hands. This bitch fighting is getting very tedious, especially considering we have very little, if any, control over what happens at Red Hall in 1 and half years time.

God, we've got 1.5 years of this?

My point is in the last decade Wakefield have been the superior team.

In your own head. Unfortunately, the majority of other people, including neutrals, would probably disagree.

Over the past 5 years, yes. Over the 5 years from 1999 to 2004, no - consistently much lower.

FINAL LEAGUE PSOISTIONS:

Wakey Cas
2009 7 8
2008 8 12
2007 - -
2006 10 11
2005 - -
2004 6 12
2003 11 8
2002 11 6
2001 11 6
2000 10 5
1999 11 5

AVE: 9.4 8.1

2 relegations and a wooden spoon.
How can you say that.

So you are just discounting our 2007 and 2005 seasons???

It is not our fault you were not in the league (well l suppose you could argue that point

).