Quote ="Towns88"Playing no recognised hooker or full back sums up millward for me. Instead of Milner and or Hudson (2 hookers) we persist with a second rower (jones) and McGoldrick. And instead of a full back in Owen (or mathers who we loaned out to our nearest and dearest) we playing a pretty aussie boy winger who cant tackle.'"
Can't for the life of me work the Milner situation out , how can we have one of our brightest prospects being the waterboy??? Ive no probs with Younquest as i think hes one of our most attacking players however he isn't and never will be a fullback (imo) , Why was Emmit dropped ??? anyone know??
Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)