The other thing is that several times in the past there have been occasions when one player or players have been given a greater sentence than another for exactly or the same offence. The RFL have always countered allegations of biasedness in these cases by pointing out that the player who was more greatly punished was done so because he had 'previous' or a bad history of disciplinary problems and therefore deserved a bigger punishment than someone who had a relatively good record.
We have been told that Richie Mathers was up for the same offence as Ferres. So how do they explain giving him exactly the same ban. Mathers was sent off twice with Wigan last year and has already served a 2 match ban this season, whilst Ferres as far as I know is pretty much squeaky clean in comparison to him , although I will stand to be corrected on that. It is like a first offender going to court and being punished exactly the same as a serial offender for the same offence.
I will be deeply unhappy with our club if we do not appeal against this unjust punishment.
I wouldn't call taking performance enhancing drugs a 'very good record''"
Christ knows how he's the only one who's got caught
Theres a pattern that develops, Cas win 3 on the trot, we get a player banned. No-one else figured that out yet?
These idiots making the decisions have no idea and certainly no qualifications as to what strikes/impacts do what to the human body. I don't really care about the intent, its totally irrelevant in the scheme of things, its the outcome that counts. Bunch of pillocks the lot of them
Quote="Tigerpie"Christ knows how he's the only one who's got caught
=redTheres a pattern that develops, Cas win 3 on the trot, we get a player banned. No-one else figured that out yet?
These idiots making the decisions have no idea and certainly no qualifications as to what strikes/impacts do what to the human body. I don't really care about the intent, its totally irrelevant in the scheme of things, its the outcome that counts. Bunch of pillocks the lot of them
'"
the conspiracy theory, your paranoid if you think that the RFL has chosen Ferris just because you have won three on the trot
Quote="snowie"icon_eek.gif the conspiracy theory, your paranoid if you think that the RFL has chosen Ferris just because you have won three on the trot
can you prove your statement?
'"
I said pattern, not theory. This pattern does repeat itself
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
little snippet from Matterson from the clip
