Hey that is better a reasonable answer without a insult.

Your right fair play.

who are the reigning fair play champions?


ermmmm fax i believe!

till we signed nash

Aye, "fair play" to nashy!

How long before OFFTHECUFF totally loses it and gets himself banned again? Next he will be offering people out.

Last word on crowds for our Widnes 'friends' = over 6,000 at Widnes v Swinton last year but they were all let in for free!
Now that didn't affect your average attendance last season then Viking fans???

RL clubs are putting false crowds out all the time like was there really as many as the 'official' attendance 288 for London Skolars v Gateshead on Sunday???
If you have been to London Skolars and I have been twice with Fax you will see why I think if they get 100 (not for a team with good away support) I am on about just home fans its a big crowd!

16 pages of repetitive arguments, can't we just give it a rest now?

good this init

It's a well known fact that RL clubs announce false figures......I mean look at Quins.....3,200 average my 'arris. We actually pack 12,000 in for our home games but nobody checks anymore and we make a real killing by diddling the inland revenue

oh dear oh dear

Widnes fans calling Fax fans arrogant



It was busier than usual plus it will always attract more fans if the Stewards let in more joint smokers...

The difference is that we have justifiable reasons to be arrogant..




I don't think Widnes fans (generalising here a bit) think that Fax fans are arrogant. There is one poster on the Widnes forum that visits here that probably puts this but I wouldn't worry too much about that. I think there is a mutual respect that exists between the two sets of supporters.
Anyway I've had my fill on here. In summary after 17 odd pages it would seem that the majority of Fax fans that attended the game thought there were more there than normal but that it didn't look like an attendance of 4795. The reason being that free tickets were given out at some fayre and counted regardless of whether the recipient attended or not.
Not that it matters because this is a nice little two finger salute to the Hoods over in Red Hall and their franchising schemes.

Nope, that was Salford in 2008 and their incredible 'Golden Angel' ticket scheme, which saw them recording far higher attendances than they can get even get in SL.



Halifax have got nowt on Salford, when it comes to crowd fiddling. They are the masters!



They ain't bad at faking stadium builds either.

OR GENERIC STADIUM NOISE!







THEY USED TO HAVE A RECORDING OF CROWDS CHEERING FROM THEIR MAIN SUPPORTER STAND....

...IN THE DAYS WHERE FAX TOOK MORE AWAY TO WILLOWS THAN THEY HAD HOME FANS....

ALWAYS MADE ME CHUCKLE



NOT NEITHER WIDNES OR FAX HAVE EVER STOOPED THAT LOW!

I really can''t be @rsed to read all 17 pages so if I'm repeating previous posts, c'est la vie.

you know we can argue til the cows come home as it's an almost totally defendable argument, but the crowd wasn't as published. You know it, I know it, the whole rugby world knows it!!!
Can't say as I blame you one iota! You play the system - Fax didn't set the rules, the RFL have done that. Fair play in my book!

I really honestly can't see what all the debate is about! SO what??????????????????????? Fax tick another box! Good on em!

Give that man a Goldfish

plus we all know the outcome of the franchises.

where i was stood in the south stand it was that packed people was stood on the stairs

i actually theought the attendance was fairly disappointing for an end of season game

why dont you sod off,, your nothing but a troll, go and troll on another board

It wasn't the end of Halifax's season, go & find a saucer of milk to stick your whiskers in....

LMAO








OOPS pml

Anyone watch the Sheffield game?

Clearly half the crowd at Bramall Lane tonight compared to when we were there yet it was announced as only 250 difference.

It doesn't matter, but it goes on every week in this sport so makes that criteria pointless.

Here's to 7,500 at Fev on Sunday