Things that i didnt like about last night

1. Everything about barrow, including getting there, the place etc
2. Rubbish Programmes, especially with it being playoff time
3. Toilets and their access- the queue was so lond and drawn out i thought i was a female
4. The Game (not the rapper, the match- what a waste of a trip)
5. corrupt ref cost us 30 points at least
6. Fans clapping the players off...why????

any others?

Nothing wrong with the ref mate. We were played off the park end of. I personally dont think that Barrow could play that well again, plus the fact that Fax made it easy for them. As for your other comments....they dont matter, who gives a stuff about the programmes etc anyway. The main thing is that Fax start winning and quickly.

And there it is

It had to come eventually.



BTW I was there and the ref, whilst poor, cost us nothing. Lack of enthusiasm, lack of possession, lack of tackles etc etc etc cost us everything.

Watching the game on tv, I dont think the ref did a great deal wrong.

I am not saying he did much wrong, but it can seem to be a bias when he gives penalty after penalty for holding down, and then not give it the other way.

I really dont blame the ref, whatsoever, its a bl00dy difficult job and he can only give what he sees.

The ref had no option the discipline was terrible.

The ref was too whistle happy first half though...for both teams.

He should have also sin binned their player for shirt pulling

I have to be honest here and say I was convinced Catic would get 10 for that !! Lucky lad !

The Ref's have had nack all to do with any of our results this season.

People who blame ref's are the same people who have either never played the game or understand the game.

And to think there is some sort of RFL conspiracy involving Ref's is just childish.

We need to remember, we are 'building' a team and we are not there yet.
our Signings for 2010 make sense and the process still continues.

Perhaps next season we will be the finshed article.

Yes the ref was a right .......

=blue[iEdited by TS[/i

Again, no holes to pick in this argument. We all know that this is a three year process and we have already got the "core" of the team signed for next season, which can only be a good thing, and then some strengthening to be done.

However..

It would still be really good to take away the pressure of having a "superleagu Application" box ticked, by appearing in the grand final

Sure, i don't think anyone was blaming the ref last night, or particularly any other game.

TBH I thought Fax where lucky not to have a man in the bin! Right are wrong that many back to back pens for messing in the rucks usually warrants action!

Yea Catic was a 10 prob, professional foul aint it!

Had to laugh when two bobs had hold of Fax players shirt keeping him down, then the second he let go asked for pen for holding down, lol, talk about gamesmanship eh!

Is it me, or did I read players talking about trying to keep rooney out of the game?

Such a task was completed poorly IMO

TBF Rooney usually takes it quite deep and hence is tough to get hold of! Coyle was the main line threat and obvioulsy got the beenfits of people looking at Rooney! Those two have geled remarkably quickly though!

was bit of a joke was that.
thought wrong decision by video ref on penky no try. ball touched line first and was from barrow player therefore drop out. not 22 restart.

I can only guess they judged no-one touched the kick? A few went for it yet didn't seem to move... though my 1st thought was drop out!

ouch!

ooh err missus

Things you liked last night.....you finally got to meet you mate Jacko. Just need to meet my mate Bingo now and you have a full house.

Ballard defo got a foot to the ball, shouldve been a drop out.

Catic shouldv'e been binned, then he goes and scores the next try and plays a role in the one after! Not saying we wouldv'e won if catic would've got 10mins but it wouldv'e helped our cause.

dont know if anyone can tell me this but the penky no try just after half time. shouldnt that have been a drop out. the Barrow player i think Ballard had an air shot but appeared to get some of the ball and it had already hit the line when penky had touched it. should it have been a drop out or am i mistaken.

without doubt a drop out should have been the decision.

surprising decision considering it was obvious on the vid ref replay.

thought the Ref had a good game overall tho.