[quote="faxcar":j8dhw5lb]Yes saw that in their thread on the subject on Total mentioning how them Batley and Dewsbury had divided Kirklees by 3. Interesting chart below from there that you will have seen but maybe not everyone on how the population numbers dictate the points. https://www.totalrl.com/forums/uploads/ ... 936f83.png In general there doesn’t seem to be any excessive resistance to the proposal though.[/quote:j8dhw5lb] Why would there be excessive resistance? If we had an owner who wants to take the club away from a shared stadium and build their own stadium and facilities, who would complain about that. Many FC supports would cheer about such a proposal and so would I.

[quote="faxcar":j8dhw5lb]Yes saw that in their thread on the subject on Total mentioning how them Batley and Dewsbury had divided Kirklees by 3. Interesting chart below from there that you will have seen but maybe not everyone on how the population numbers dictate the points. https://www.totalrl.com/forums/uploads/ ... 936f83.png In general there doesn’t seem to be any excessive resistance to the proposal though.[/quote:j8dhw5lb] Why would there be excessive resistance? If we had an owner who wants to take the club away from a shared stadium and build their own stadium and facilities, who would complain about that. Many FC supports would cheer about such a proposal and so would I.

https://windinguppetitionsolicitors.co. ... %20records. In an article about the ongoing Tax issue that will be coming up next Thursday it also mentions the Fax consortium working towards securing the future of the Shay. This was obviously before the Davy proposals but shows that whoever they are as of a couple of months ago they were actively involved with the club and as with the rest of it regarding the tax, the Shay and the new consortium ownership we await further news.

https://windinguppetitionsolicitors.co. ... %20records. In an article about the ongoing Tax issue that will be coming up next Thursday it also mentions the Fax consortium working towards securing the future of the Shay. This was obviously before the Davy proposals but shows that whoever they are as of a couple of months ago they were actively involved with the club and as with the rest of it regarding the tax, the Shay and the new consortium ownership we await further news.