Personally I think that one good thing has come out of this situation - making the council aware that they have to maximise revenue for what they've got. We've seen an example of that recently with the sponsorship of the East Stand. It has paid for work to be done on the ground with no risk to either club or the tax payer. I'm quite happy for Reactiv to sponsor the Shay, but see no need for them to own it.
And yes, if anyone else tries to buy the ground I'll fight it just as hard - especially if it is the football club's BOD.
Looks like the council wanted rid and were not too fussed who they sold it to. Looks like the council are hiding some information to me. Might turn out that Tony Abbott was not the main villain in all this but given all the information Im not sure many people would still say they would be happy if he ended up getting it.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
