Did you not know the name of Lorenzo Acerra? He's mentioned in the same breath as Einstein, Hawking, and Newton...

...That's Donald Einstein, George Hawking, and Arthur Newton.

When Stanley goes off on one, I'm reminded of a quote by the late, great Christopher Hitchens:

"People like that should be out in the street, shouting and hollering with a cardboard sign and selling pencils from a cup."

Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"Wonderful Lunacy Eh ''Butch''. Well Debunk this then. The [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYo29Si4qf0Moon[/url is its own light source. Lets see who's the Loon now. '" Your problem, like Mulder, is you want to believe. This means you have a total inability to critically examine anything. If it fits your preconceptions then you swallow it hook line and sinker. I don't give a shiit whether the moon is its own light source, or lit by the sun, or whatever, I only want to establish the facts. If the moon was its own light source, great for it. But it isn't. The explanation for the illusion you so want to be true (curvilinear perspective) is not simple to explain, because it is counter-intuitive, but 100% understandable and coldly obvious, as long as you are prepared to read and understand it. That of course excludes you, but for anyone else who may be interested in the answer to what is indeed, superficially, a curiosity, is very well explained here: muddycolors.blogspot.co.uk/2011/ ... ctive.html HTH

Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"Wonderful Lunacy Eh ''Butch''. Well Debunk this then. The [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYo29Si4qf0Moon[/url is its own light source. Lets see who's the Loon now. '" Your problem, like Mulder, is you want to believe. This means you have a total inability to critically examine anything. If it fits your preconceptions then you swallow it hook line and sinker. I don't give a shiit whether the moon is its own light source, or lit by the sun, or whatever, I only want to establish the facts. If the moon was its own light source, great for it. But it isn't. The explanation for the illusion you so want to be true (curvilinear perspective) is not simple to explain, because it is counter-intuitive, but 100% understandable and coldly obvious, as long as you are prepared to read and understand it. That of course excludes you, but for anyone else who may be interested in the answer to what is indeed, superficially, a curiosity, is very well explained here: muddycolors.blogspot.co.uk/2011/ ... ctive.html HTH

Hmm. Let's see, shall we


Nonsense. The Earths axis is tilted in relation to the ecliptic plane at approx. 23.5 degrees. You made your absurd figure up.


Oops! The speed is actually 2,288 mph. You made yours up.


But your invented numbers are just a figment of your imagination, though.

Like your delusion that you "only post true evidence", as is very clear just from the above.

Hahaha. The supposed Earth's tilt is 23.4° and not 23.5° yeah. So that leaves 66.6° off horizontal 90°. Hmmm very much Masonic numerology being brainwashed into the hogwash called Science.

It is 23.5 yeah. Every number there is will leave 66.6 if you randomly pick that number + 66.6 as your starting point as you just did. But that missing 0.1 completely demolishes your frankly silly point.

Did you read and accept the debunk of your shiny moon delusion, btw, or is it too embarrassing for you to mention again?

To prove the fact that the supposed axis tilt is [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_tilt23.4°[/url. Again proving the evidence I provide is always the truth.

So what happens when it is not 23.4 and therefore your 66.6 theory doesn't work?

It's all hogwash period. Theirs no Globe proof. The preponderance of evidence lies with a stationary plane.

At risk of repeating what others have already said - some likeminded nutjobs on YouTube does not equate to evidence of any kind, let alone a preponderance of the stuff.

As predicted some posts ago for example, there is indeed YouTube evidence that the moon is made of cheese - I checked.

Oh I almost forgot. At what speed does the Earth travel around the sun? 66.600 mph. Hahaha. Science is hogwash.
Please convert 18.5 miles per second to Miles Per Hour. 66.600 MPH. Oh the fakery of Science makes me laugh

Do you have some obsession to bend figures just to make them fit your delusions?

A more precise figure for the axial tilt is 23.4393 degrees. It does NOT fit your delusion. The Earth's mean orbital speed is 66,622 mph.

Moreover, as the orbit is not a perfect circle but an ellipse, it varies from top speed in January, when nearest the Sun, to slowest in July, when furthest from the Sun.

Moreover, the axial tilt is not fixed, it also varies over time.

These facts mean your theories are nonsense.

Are you ready to admit your moonshine theory was also rubbish?

I don't make them up. Science does.
23.4° ==#BF0000 66.6° off Horizontal Truth Flat Earth. Also, the speed of the Earth traveling around the Sun is=#FF0040 66.6000Mph. I don't make it up Science does.

23.4393 degrees is NOT 23.4. Whichever way you want to look at it. The Satanic number is, apparently, 666. Where is it noted down as 665.5893 or any other non-whole number?

Er, nowhere. So you are utterly busted on this one. Give it up.

The Earth's mean orbital speed is 66,622 mph, which isn't 66,600. Again, busted - and that is even before you consider that this is a MEAN speed, the Earth is practically NEVER actually travelling at that speed, it is either speeding up from it, or slowing down from it.

You are renowned for clutching at straws, but even by your standards, factual number denial is a first.

Still, it gives you something to do to avoid confronting the total debunk of your moon-is-a-light-source hokum. Again, your standard tactic -when debunked, just go schtumm, and hope nobody will notice that you posted what turned out to be just more nonsense.

So this World Order, or whatever name you want to give them, have all these extremely important secrets and societies that they don't want average Joe's like us to know about. They control the world economy, governments, armies, science etc, yet they're unable to shut down/silence a few geeks posting YouTube videos?

Oh Yes, they do silence YouTube Researchers. The CIA actually pay agents to basically sit on their PC's all day and to infiltrate certain movements with an agenda to cause nothing but disruption to the movements with the sole intention of behaving chaotic and purposely trying to nullify the numbers getting to hear/view certain video's which the information is damning to their agenda's. These agents are called Shills, and when they successfully infiltrate a movement they upload false information with the intention of making you believe their information is the real deal which they're hopeful of confusing you which in time will guide or take you away from watching a certain channel or topic because it's information they definitely detest getting into the public domain. But when a movement starts to snowball like the flat earth, it's quite easy to ascertain who's shilly or not. YouTube is Raging with [url=https://www.google.co.uk/?ion=1&espv=2#q=shillShills[/url. Trying to police certain topics away from the public domain. Honestly.

Not shills. Just people who disagree with nonsense.

I presume that unbeknownst to me, I'm a CIA Shill, then? Or are you just avoiding stuff you have no answer to, Stan?

Like why does the Moon look upside down from Australia. Or any of the above.

Ok. So the World Order or whatever they're called have recognised that these are nerds posting YouTube vids exposing the truth, and the only thing that can do about it is get CIA agents to sit at PC's all day posting on message boards and comments sections?

It would be nice if Shills really existed, I'd apply to be one then at least I'd be getting paid to laugh at Stan, rather than doing it out of sheer good will.

The great big Satellite hoax. [url=http://submarinecablemap.com/#/Take A Look At This Smoking Gun[/url Here is something interesting, a map of the undersea cables around the world.[u I noticed that NONE seem to take the shortest route in the southern hemisphere. I wonder WHY...[/u

These smoking guns are common, though. Take at look at another one:



I went on the London underground for years, and this map is a total fake. The trains go round bends and all sorts, and half the stations are in the wrong place. Clear proof that they want you to avoid the lairs of the lizards.

And it's not just trains and cables. Once, i wanted to wire up a SCART lead so i downloaded a diagram. Here it is, look:



But, let me tell you, if you ever actually take one of those big boys apart, it is all a lie. The wires look more like this:

This thread will forever be quiet from now on I guess. The only other hardcore delusional is a mod with his own conspiracy echo chamber that nobody is allowed to disagree with/post in/have a different view.