[iWell Attenborough and the elite have got a vested interest haven't they.[/i

Exactly. Their Darwinian Mythology evilution link.

A vested interest that creationists/conspiracy theorists have made up.

to take all the space

At the same time in North America, marsh and cope, faked, named and produced the dinosaurs. Utter fabricated masonic garbage and the sheople lap up the Dino pooh. Unbelievable.

You surely can't believe that, can you?

It takes a special kind of 'special' to even type that.

In 20 years that is THE most ridiculous thing I've ever seen on the internet. In fact it's so stark staring bonkers barking mad I'm going to print it out and pass it around.

Come on now, honest answer, you're on a wind up.

The Galapagos Landings were a hoax! Darwin never went!

Now come on folks, you simply couldn't get this level of comedy anywhere else!

I now realise there ARE no Galapagos islands! The many documentaries I've watched were all in fact filmed in a fake island built in the middle of a fake ocean hidden somewhere in Hollywood! The giant tortoises - some of which you can "see" in zoos around the world - are just animatronics!

How could we all have missed this?

[i
And you surely can't believe humans existed from 200,000 years ago? You are just believing fairytale stories. You have no evidence. Look at all that incessant rant you went on, and it's all 'logic' stories without one piece of evidence.

How could you document the moment you ask? Why not document even one piece of transformation? Nothing. You believe they found 'dinosaur' bones (that look like whale bones and other bones mixed together) from 64 million years ago yet not one skeleton to prove any such in-between to prove the wild claims made about evolution?

Exactly what I said would happen with you, and I am right that evolution is the easiest of the hoaxes to expose. You have nothing. Darwin was a devout Freemason so even he didn't believe his own bull.

[/i

I'm glad I found this collection of posts. I've spent most of my working day reading through it. Comedy gold.

Come on Stan, your audience awaits!


Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

[i

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"Come on Stan, your audience awaits! Does this look like a "whale bone" to you?

'"

Awe you're becoming more of an embarrassment with every post. It looks like a tree trunk simulated to look like a bone. Now hrere's that very supposed bone which is a replica as mentioned in tht Telegraph article. Hahaha they even tell you in plain sight it's a replica. Poor Aardvark falls for it every-time its hilarious.

[/i

[i[size=150Sir David Attenborough with a =#BF0000replica of the titanosaur's femur Photo: BBC[/size[/i

So you have (as usual) no answers to my last set of points. Quelle surprise!

Sticking with fossils, do try to catch the documentary Stan - you can watch the actual fossil being actually dug up, then encased in protective coating, transported, and in the lab. You'll also see how and why they make replicas.

Though why you would think there is something odd or sinister in a person photographing a replica and saying: "Here's a replica" is a mystery!

Here ya go - originals partly excavated, still on site, where the dinosaur died. Not replicas.

Ironically, you've just summarized the basic requirement for the devout, regardless of which brand of imaginary friend they believe in; blind faith, with no facts, evidence or proof to back up any of the crazy claims they depend on.

[iHahaha still unemployed butch...Awe poor lad

[/i

Why do you keep saying I'm unemployed? You don't know anything about me except what I've chosen to tell you. Seems a poor way of brushing off anything Bren writes, and a weird dig at me seeing as I actually told you what I was employed as. You see, it's quite easy to keep tabs on a forum throughout the day because science has made it possible to carry around a personal pc in your pocket, so that whatever you need is only a button press away. Somewhat ironic that the sum total of human knowledge is even at your fingertips, yet you choose to use it to further a life of fantasy and mental illness.

Do you have any evidence that this is factually incorrect? No.


Er, not even remotely the case. Not within a seven day camel ride of the facts. I mean, given that most people understand at least the basics of sedimentary layers, how they form, and how they are moved to the surface by tectonic activity, I'd suggest you developed at least a basic understanding of the first principles before making moronic comments.


Look, if a dinosaur died in one spot then it would be plainly obvious, even to the average cretin, that, being dead, its remains would broadly speaking remain around that spot. If for example its femur is in Patagonia, where would you expect its tibia to be - Poland?

Whenever any bodily remains are discovered, it is not astonishing that by carefully excavating the immediate spot, you'll find most of the remaining bones. You would have to be a moron not to get that.


Is it? What about this moron-level idea for displaying an anything
1. Dismantle and pack
2. Take somewhere else
3. Re-assemble and display.

Only a moron would fail to understand something so totally simple.



Your number skills are a bit off, but making allowance for your moronicity I suppose I should give due credit that you got the 1 before the zeros. But, what is the reason why a bone of a dead anything might not be sticking out of the ground? Lots of things stick out of the ground, often exposed when erosion takes place - you know, wind, water, that sort of stuff. The mere fact of something sticking out of the ground is not a valid objection. It is you who oozes bull.

PS It would be "carcass", and it wasn't, it was a fossilised bone.

Which seems entirely plausible when pitted against, say, a lone shepherd being spoken to by god through the medium of a burning bush...

Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet.

I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?

Quote ="bandgeekmafia78"Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet. I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?'" Yep. Take his last post for example on Dinosaur bones: Quote ="FLAT STANLEY""David "Eugenics pioneer of bull Sir Freemasoic Attenborough" has recently been in a BBC documentary called 'Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur' which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims. It starts with the romantic story of a lone Patagonian farmer looking for a lost sheep and chances upon the largest bone ever found just sticking out of the ground. Apparently this bone has been buried for around 100 million years under a few inches of dirt! A team is assembled and cameras are all over it. But you only see them digging and chipping at rock. Not once do you see a bone being uncovered for the first time. You only see them after they have been completely excavated/put in place. By digging a few feet down they manage to find 200 bones belonging to a Totalbullasaur (Sorry, Titanosaur). Then the show ends with them assembling and welding together the 120ft long dinosaur in a warehouse. How they plan to get it out of there and on display is a total mystery to me. But too many people just eat this crap up. To me it looks like carved rock. As if a 1000.000 year old carcous is going to be stuck out the ground like a sore thumb just oozes bull.'" This was copy and pasted from here; ifers.ace.st/t56-dinosaur-hoax-d ... er-existed Scroll down towards the bottom to a post from someone called 'Paranoid Gramdroid'. It's pretty much word for word, except Stanley has replaced certain bits of wording, such as; "which I had the misfortune of watching the end of whilst round at a friends house. Today I downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims", to; "which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims". Pretty sad really. I caught Alice at it the other day too, who has mysteriously vanished.

Quote ="bandgeekmafia78"Flat Stanley's posts on the whole appear to be series of Copy/Pastes from the Internet. I'm not trying to troll by saying this, but are you plagiarising other people's work because you can't articulate your arguments so eloquently?'" Yep. Take his last post for example on Dinosaur bones: Quote ="FLAT STANLEY""David "Eugenics pioneer of bull Sir Freemasoic Attenborough" has recently been in a BBC documentary called 'Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur' which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims. It starts with the romantic story of a lone Patagonian farmer looking for a lost sheep and chances upon the largest bone ever found just sticking out of the ground. Apparently this bone has been buried for around 100 million years under a few inches of dirt! A team is assembled and cameras are all over it. But you only see them digging and chipping at rock. Not once do you see a bone being uncovered for the first time. You only see them after they have been completely excavated/put in place. By digging a few feet down they manage to find 200 bones belonging to a Totalbullasaur (Sorry, Titanosaur). Then the show ends with them assembling and welding together the 120ft long dinosaur in a warehouse. How they plan to get it out of there and on display is a total mystery to me. But too many people just eat this crap up. To me it looks like carved rock. As if a 1000.000 year old carcous is going to be stuck out the ground like a sore thumb just oozes bull.'" This was copy and pasted from here; ifers.ace.st/t56-dinosaur-hoax-d ... er-existed Scroll down towards the bottom to a post from someone called 'Paranoid Gramdroid'. It's pretty much word for word, except Stanley has replaced certain bits of wording, such as; "which I had the misfortune of watching the end of whilst round at a friends house. Today I downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims", to; "which I had the misfortune of watching the whole programme as i downloaded this work of fiction just to see/hear their claims". Pretty sad really. I caught Alice at it the other day too, who has mysteriously vanished.

He/She/It will be back as soon as Stan forgets to take the meds.

Hahaha get a job.