hey Stan - re your sig -



This Isaiah dude ... what was he smoking? You make much of the point that a circle can't be a globe. But you inexplicably IGNORE your man Isaiah's completely inconsistent claim that Earth has "FOUR CORNERS".

I mean, it's not as if scriptures aren't completely full of guff, contradictions and archaic flowery meaningless nonsense, but really, how can you quote these fundamentally incompatible descriptions in your sig, without realizing that Isaiah is seemingly just winging it, and can't remember what he said from one verse to the next?

A circle, with four corners, Stan?

I don't hold out any hope that he may admit a slight error in his reasoning...

[iIt's the collapse of physics as we know it" This was just a test on the researchers to see if they would react to a real discovery, false data was injected and the researchers thought it was real and ran with it even though later on they were told it was falsified data and this was back in 2011 LIGO Detects Gravitational Waves using blind injection simulation which means it is basically a hoax or false flag [url=https://youtu.be/_mvANE_ySFkFake Injected Signal[/url



Here is the whistle-blowing Guardian Not the Daily Mash article warning about trusting such a claim. [url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2016/jan/12/gravitational-wave-detection-could-be-a-false-alarmGravitational Bull[/url

In this article you will discover the fakery is done on a need to basis with only the top 4 directors aware of the Gravitational Waves hoax [url=http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/02/here-s-first-person-spot-those-gravitational-wavesscience magazine[/url

[/i
[i Why can't they do research here on Earth where gravitation is supposedly present everywhere? Why are they looking for something so far away that nobody can imagine the distance? It's because its easier to disguise and they baffle you with mathematics. Another fake hoax to prove something to be working just to keep the mainstream science profitable for the next decades... Like black holes and red shift. Nobody can verify and never will. All the answers are here on Earth if we once again try to understand physics in a multidisciplinary way. They have to try to convince people that gravity exists light years away but they can't/won't ever prove it on earth so they hoax the bull from light years away. Hahaha and people swallow it.

[/i

Haha.

Absolute comedy gold.

It surely is. Science

Dare I ask, again, when it happened?

Sorry but we're talking about the Gravitational wave injection and the claim by Michio Kaku that Einstein's theories are total horse manure. Hehehe. Do you have a opinion on Michio's claim.?

[iA lot sooner than you think Butcher Boy.[/i

No - [url=http://observer.com/2016/02/michio-kaku-explains-gravitational-waves-as-baby-pictures-of-the-big-bang/I'll let him do it.[/url

Seems pretty unequivocal, yes?

Well he's contradicting himself as my clip shows. He admitted Einstein's infinity law is flawed so Gravitational waves are debunked and hoaxed at the same time pardon the pun. Simples

Typical scientist moving the goal posts to fit the agenda. Nothing new..

Has Stan explained how Isaiah had four corners on the circle of Earth yet?

He explained it several pages back. I understood it quite easily. Very straight forward.

Great for you. But I am unfortunately unable to see invisible posts that exist only in your head, so maybe you could convert his explanation of how a circle can have four corners into type and post it here? There's a good chap.

Ouch. Flex the vex. Stop being lazy and scroll back, its plain and simple. It was very well elaborated with dictionary links so its quite impossible not to understand really .Go ahead and look young chap.....

I don't need to, he has never answered. He did post a graphic of a circle containing a cross. This does not fit the word "answer". This circle does not have corners, any more than any other circle does. No corners. So no, he has not answered, and all but delusionals know he can't answer, because circles do not have corners. Ever.

But, if Stan disagrees, I await his answer. Either from his main account or your alias will do fine.

HTH

I hope you disavow yourself from everything that science provides you in the modern age, or do you choose to cherry-pick the bits that suit you? Just like you do with the bible?

You're using a computer that a homosexual atheist invented, so there's one thing you've cheekily cherry-picked. I'm guessing that you're probably on some heavy medication that you obviously didn't refuse. Actually, judging by your posts and the split personalities you may have missed a few prescriptions. You're obviously using electricity, and I hope there's no plastics in your house at all, because of that pesky science. You obviously wont eat any fruit or vegetables as they've all been modified artificially to produce high yields and resistance to pests. Presumably no TV or radio in your cell, sorry, house either. The list could go on...

Science is alright in your book as long as it doesn't disagree with your book eh?

Hypocrite.

I've been thinking the same since he slithered in from whichever conspiracy forum he's been lurking on.

Interesting that all of Alice's posts are on these threads rather than any rugby ones. Either it's Stan as we all suspect, or Stan has convinced one of his flat-earth mates he knows to sign up to RLFans to give him a bit of 'backup'.


One thing that get's brought up when discussing creationism is fossils and dinosaur skeletons - transformed into rock or in the ground for millions of years. What's the explanation behind them Alice & Stan?

Oil & Natural Gas deposits - how are they there an how can they be created in such a short space of time?

Volcanoes - how can islands like Hawaii be created in just a few thousand years?

Lime Stone - created from the fossilised remains of sea creatures and transformed over millions of years.

If the answers I've been taught aren't correct, what's the explanation for all the above?

[iI really don't know why i have to prove this four corners of the Earth, it's nursery stuff. Poor lad look up the word [url=https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=corner+definitionCorner[/url.
Isaiah 11-12 was referring to the second phrase of the definition[/i.[i 2. a location or area, especially one regarded as secluded or remote, Look for the word Quarter that's also there too. [/i.


Four corners of the Earth.Simples
Isaiah 11:12=#BF0000[i And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.
[/i [iSee Isaiah was referring to the second definition, A location or area especially one regarded as secluded or remote. Hahahaha keep trying, The Bible has never been debunked by theologians never-mind you bunch of Sheep.

[/i

Not to mention the fact that human life as we know it, even by the most conservative calculations, has existed on earth for around 200,000 years; the bible says that Jesus did his thing around 2000 years ago - so what was this intelligent creator doing for the 198,000 or so years that preceded his intervention? And why, given all his goodness and majesty, did his intervention take the form of child sacrifice?

The basic principles of religion are cruel, tyrannical and oppressive, and have been disproved to such a convincing extent that it's entirely risible that people believe this bunkum in the modern world. If it makes you feel better, feel free, but for goodness sake, don't inflict it on other people and don't expect any special treatment because of your religious sensitivities.

[iAwe Mr Butch is getting all eat up with personal angst attacks because his religious gravitational bull turned out to be an injection hoax as-well as Michio kaku dismissing Einstein's infinity law as bull. Awe Science is flawed Butch and it's about time you realized this so you can move on in life.[/i



[iWith regards to the Bible your guessed assumption that i cherry-pick Scripture to suit is utter nonsense, i take the Bible literally as my source of truth. Whereas you have Occultists/Satanists as your source for truth. I really feel / Pity for you on that.[/i

[iAnd why did you bring up the word homosexual, the basis of one's sexual preferences has nothing to do with this conversation.

[/i

[iHahaha now Mr Butch again blurts out personal brain jabs. Fortunately for me my medication isn't complexed, it's quite simple with no heavy dosage medications needed as of yet. Also i have TV and Radio which i rarely use due to Mainstream programming. I however use my TV Radio for sports Rugby League etc..in my lovely adapted bungalow not exactly a cell .

[/i
[iYou seem to spend and waste an awful amount of time on here arguing your angst vitriolic abuse towards me. Do you not work, can't work, part-time work at all. Thought you were a firearms officer.? Well you get ample time off to spend most of your days ridiculing me for a firearms officer, Sounds like a good job for skiving.

[/i

[iHahahaha What a hypocrite, your spewing your Religion nonsense onto these boards Mr Butch... Get a life...and a job...

[/i

As has become the theme - no actual rebuttal of the points I made, just a solipsistic soundbite, with an immature ad-hominem jibe thrown in for good measure.