Thats been tried before. Talking of Rommel, not seen him/her/them around here for a while

nor on the FC site, funny eh?

anyway, back on topic, is kirkstaller still promoting his bigotted views......

Yes, you think he'd have moved on to somewhere else to preach wouldn't you? I'm just half way though watching a programme about being in the Moonies, now there is a cult if ever I saw one

No doubt Kirkstaller will come back agreeing with me saying his way is the only way.

David Koresh had nothing on Kirkstaller, as I may have said before!

How do you define a "man"?

So Dally is a bigot... and we're slagging off people of religion?

don't worry, you posess none of the traits required.

If I'm reading your post correctly, you seem to be implying that there's some sort of conflict between the two things.

To begin with, I don't think we're slagging off all religious people (not in this thread, anyway), just the ones whose religious beliefs make them want to deny equal rights to people who are different to them. And the ones whose religious beliefs make them think doctors who perform abortions are worse than rapists.

Even if we were slagging off all religious people, I think being intolerant of those who are born a certain way (gay, black, disabled, whatever) is entirely different to being intolerant of those who choose to hold an outlandish belief in the face of all the available evidence. A ridiculous view is a ridiculous view, regardless of whether it's a belief in a supreme being or the belief that Widnes will lift this year's Super League title.

What a poor tactic. What you do is ignore every question, and you hope it will be submerged and your swerve not noticed, or forgotten.

Now, and for the second time, you innocently ask "What questions"?

As if you didn't know.

They are those questions that YOU READ when I posted them, and consciously decided it was best to swerve. Those questions.

And now you have an even more pathetic swerve, you no doubt "can't be be bothered" or "haven't the time" to look back in the thread for them.

You've been rumbled, pal. There is only ONE reason you have not answered and that is the questions defeat you so you choose to pretend they never happened. Well done.


Er, or else god never did intercede in any of the OT fairytales, and the reason we never see god interceding nowadays is not because he's (for reasons you don't explain) changed his rather erratic game plan, but because he doesn't exist. You are quite correct in that he has not intervened since the OT. All you need to get your head around now is that he never did during OT times either, and as Occam would explain why that is.




This is in need of explanation. God doesn't intervene. But in your case, he did, to the extent of a one-to-one chat with JC, which is why you are where you are. You need to explain how that is not "intervention". Or did he decide never to interfere with the rest of humanity, but made a single exception in your case?








Can i just point out to kirkstaller and his apologists and others objecting to one sided name calling that this here is kirkstaller calling tb "CRAZY". Not very Christian, IMHO.


Explain that to me. You are saying that you sought a relationship with JC, and so he popped round? I would suggest that your god or his son personally visiting one of his sinners is the clearest intervention in human affairs there could be. How is personally meeting a deity, and thus knowing, as opposed to believeing, they exist, not intervention?


Until I was in my early teens I had been brainwashed into all this religious bull and so was a firm believer. Why did JC pass up on the opportunity of popping round to mine, then, while he had the chance? (Knowing in advance, as he does, that if he did. I would forever be saved, but if he didn't, I was a goner? Not very fair that. Why did he choose to intervene to save your bigoted ass but leave me to rot in hell?


He doesn't nor do I. You can't advance your own argument by quoting your own written materials! The one who needs to revisit it would presumably be the one who claims to have met god personally thereby removing the need to have any faith.

tbf to Kirkstaller, logic has never been a strong suite of the religiously deluded.

or even suit

Or even suit

Few pages late, so it may have been adressed,

but, if we're going to accept levels of Interceding on a personal/local/national/world/universal event scale, then it could be argued that God interceding by sending his son to you is not overly different (in terms of scale) to God smiting a 4 year old heretic that has, by your definition, borne false witness.

What are these traits? If you cannot define the term how can I assess your contention? How can I list criteria to decide who is more of a man me or you?

Why do I care, you're less of a man than anyone I've ever come across. Wether you agree or not is irrelevant to me.

Just about sums you up, a name-calling, 10.5 stone wannabee bully!

think what you like, opinions count when they come from people you respect.

anyway, lets get back to the bigoted homphobe that we know you are, eh?

Let's. Why am I a "homophobe."

do we REALLY need to go here, again, just admit your views, be a "man" about them, maybe?

God clearly allowed you to be made that way and as he nowadays operates a total non-intervention policy, (apart from sending his lad to personally see important sinners), that's the reason.

[url=http://web.orange.co.uk/article/news/milky_way_will_collide_with_andromeda_galaxyBloody hell Sin Binners[/url we've been worried about making comments that get the site into trouble legally, no it seems the great sky pixie has put us "on notice"

Sometimes, when a person has repressed homosexual feelings, they find it easier to rail against homosexuality than to address those feelings. Perhaps that's why.

Didn't you once alledge to have slapped your son because he told you he might be gay or did I dream that?

Priceless isn't it.

A bigot it someone who is intolerant of other peoples views. There is a lot of intolerance towards the views of religious people on this thread. So the people who are calling others bigots are actually bigots themselves.

Extremists too. Hating every essence of religion is an extreme viewpoint.

Extremist bigots.

Priceless isn't it.

A bigot it someone who is intolerant of other peoples views. There is a lot of intolerance towards the views of Nazis on this thread. So the people who are calling others bigots are actually bigots themselves.

Extremists too. Hating every essence of Nazism is an extreme viewpoint.

Extremist bigots