Is it just me or does it never seem to matter what ministers do - they seem to be allowed to resign?

Over the years i can only seem to recall Gavin Williamson(Defence secretary) and around 2006 Charles Clarke actually been sacked.

When i say sacked - i mean properly sacked, not a reshuffle of cabinet or been asked to resign, like us mere mortals - "theres your P45 - bye bye"

The standard is set by the leader which is currently a very high bar because it is doubtful any one individual could have done more than Johnson himself.

Indeed
Sleeping with an adviser is a pre requisite for progression within the Tory Party.
It's amazing how (alleged) adultery is ok, killing 1000's of innocent people is ok, telling lies to your boss and the general public is ok and yet getting within 2 metres of a "friend" is what gets you the push.
What a crazy world we now live in !

Adultery in itself is not really a resigning matter - although it seems a lot of the current ruling party have loose morals compared to the standards they hold others to.

Affairs with people who work for you are more problematic - there is a potential power dynamic issue, and of course a potential conflict of interest.

Affairs with people you appoint to made up jobs and then breach laws with that you create.... even this corrupt government couldn't ignore that.

And of course in yet another amazing coincidence the brother of his mistress has been given another of those sweet sweet Tory government NHS contracts. I'd be tempted to have a lusty affair with Hancock if that's the ticket to millions too.

And still the blind defenders of the cult will refuse to hold them to account.

They say power is an afrodisiac - it must be how do either of those two get a shag?

Hanky intoxicatingly ravished her mesmorising tuity fruities as the care homes blazed



Bet Boris has been there to

Is it a show of your manliness and fitness for battle - this party is a joke

Now we know why he was a supporter of "eat out to help out"

Gawd knows!
Mind you, if the pillock in No10 manages to get a portion or two there's hope for everyone.

It's good to see that the government are going to investigate the leaked CCTV footage.
For balance, they should also investigate ho Hancock's new squeeze landed her job and how her brother's firm landed a large NHS contract, something which, once again, they just want to skim over and try to ignore.

The situation with grace and favours seems out of control and our government are certainly looking after their own.
I guess is the more likely meaning of "levelling up". There will be no levelling up when it eventually comes to paying down the national debt.

Johnson can’t even take the moral high ground with the alleged taking of his stress reliever looking at his hands, away on tax payers expense because the PM did the same with his pole dancing coach when mayor of London.

I have never seen CCTV inside our buildings so this has been interesting to know. I'd like to know were they are, and which organisation is in charge of monitoring them. But that's not on ideological grounds, it's just I'm single and if I ever find someone willing to kiss me, I want to be off camera.

Good to see Boris did the right thing in sacking him.

Boris fondled a young ladies temptations, while Hanky fondled his Molls honeypot, while the Care Homes were arsoned

When asked about whether he ever uses a personal email account to conduct government business, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said ‘I don’t comment on how I conduct government business.’

What a Prime Minister does in the execution of his duties is nobody else’s business I guess. It’s a cheek to have even asked really.

Good ol “Bonk It” Boris

The only ones anywhere near the sack were Hancock and his squeeze. Boris, once again was dithering and waiting, instead of taking decisive action.

Maybe he was waiting for advice from the leader of the Alternative party.

Well, he certainly didn't sack Matt "Hanky Panky" Hancock, although he did, briefly, try and claim that he had.
In fact, despite the many intersessions of those in his cabinet or, his advisers, regardless of their actions, he doesn't seem to sack any of them.
Mind you, for a bloke with six (known) kids to almost as many different women, it's hardly a surprise..

So you don't really know if he was waiting for advice from the alternative party leader or not? but thought you'd use my post to further pour scorn on the leader of our government.

He probably has had scorn poured on him by one of his many lady friends along with cream and chocolate.

It's probably his charisma what has all the ladies chasing him, something the alternative party leader is completely lacking in hence there standing with the great British public.

It's pretty much a cult ladies and gentlemen.

Do you mean his standing or the parties standing your post is a little mixed.

People are actually talking about how much they admire the Prime Minister's virility. We're in Dear Leader territory.