It's all starting to sound a bit shifty to me now. Apparently the Italian man and the Austrian man weren't even on the plane they we back home in their own countries. Both men had their passports stolen in Thailand 2 years ago according to Sky News. How the hell have 2 ransoms even managed to board that plane with stolen passports? Major security breach at the very least.

You really have to ask such a question?




Here is a challenge.

Define the "centre", if you can, and then lets decide if you actually understand what your dogma driven, non original posts are on about and that if my posts are common sense and caring which yours obviously are not.

Found parts of an airline wreckage out in the sea.

that wreckage or what they thought appears not to be connected to the flights disappearance.

Getting all very ' Lost ' now

It is. A lad at work joked when it first went missing that they would have to struggle past the smoke monster and befriend the polar bears in case the others came.

Everything about it is just weird from the start. The last thing I heard on the news was some expert going on about how 'they' had expertly disabled the communications systems then flown the plane for 5 hours, then 'most probably' ran out of fuel over the ocean.

And at no point did the news anchor ask why someone would plan and execute a move to expertly disable the communications system, execute it, then deliberately crash the plane into the sea, or forget to check the fuel gauge? What would the motive be? If it were just to kill those on board, why the need to disable the communication system?

I think it's getting very other worldly now.

I think the only thing they CAN say with any accuracy is that the plane is on earth. Somewhere.

Your proof of this?

None whatsoever.

My theories. 1. The pilot tried to fly to space, and succeeded. 2. The flight never even existed, computer hackers just made it look like a plane had been lost and this has been the fall out. 3. Aliens have nicked the plane.

My best guess of a genuine nature would be one of the pilots having a serious mental breakdown and crashing deliberately into the sea. Don't really want to imagine that though. I'd prefer if the plane had been landed on some remote airstrip, but I think that we'd have somehow heard from the passengers if that was the case.

Dunno if man can put a lancaster bomber on the moon, a modernish jet should be a doddle.

Dunno if man can put a lancaster bomber on the moon, a modernish jet should be a doddle.

Most credible theory I've heard is that there's been a heist of something very valuable amongst the cargo.

The pilots, in on it, turned off the transponders, turned the plane around, climbed to 45,000 ft (as has been reported per the tracked telemetry), de-pressurised the cabin to kill the passengers. Then either landed the plane at a pre-agreed remote airstrip rendezvous to unload the target cargo, or parachute the target cargo into the [Andaman? sea at pre-agreed co-ordinates. The pilots then programme the auto-pilot to fly the plane in the wrong direction at low level (to avoid radar) until it runs out of fuel & ditches, so as to make finding the wreckage (and therefore evidence) near impossible, and bail out themselves.

That's bonkers rather than credible!

The most credible thing I've read is [url=https://plus.google.com/app/basic/stream/z13cv1gohsmbv5jmy221vrfyiz3vdhbop04this[/url

That would make one hell of a movie, I'd watch it.

Another theory was that it could have possibly been shot down, as the aircraft does not respond on any frequency and it cannot be contacted.

That does sound more plausible.

But then the BBC are now reporting that the last communication with the plane, where the co-pilot confirms everything's OK, came after the transponders were switched off. And that doesn't fit that guy's theory.

I'm not sure that's true, yesterday the Malaysians said that the last communication from the co-pilot came after the last transmission from the ACARS system but that system only sends a signal every 30 minutes. So they don't know when that system was switched off other than a 30 minute window.

cutting through media crap, there seems to be a plausible explanation, but that wouldn't be much of a story would it? www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh ... ical-fire/

cutting through media crap, there seems to be a plausible explanation, but that wouldn't be much of a story would it? www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh ... ical-fire/

Only that plausible explanation is a load of tripe with the known facts

I suspect certain people have been in cahoots....

[url=https://plus.google.com/113471522788647981606/about?gl=uk&hl=enThe nightclub in Blackpool?[/url

Any chance of Ms Burley being detained in Kuala Lumpur and the key being thrown away?

[urlhttp://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/19/kay-burley-and-press-chase-down-mh370-relatives_n_4991410.html?utm_hp_ref=uk[/url

Which 'facts' contradict that explanation?

For me, that is the most plausible explanation. The media hype hoping for it to be terrorist related, or even a planned heist of some kind, plus the withholding of information from the different areas involved, has caused major delays in finding the plane.