If Starmer didn't attend he'd be standing by his principles. But he is so he isn't. I'm not outraged as it is what I would expect from him. Nor do I read the Mail or god forbid lick anyone's spittle, it sounds disgusting.

Don't forget to boo the England team when they genuflect. Love how it maddens knuckle draggers everywhere.

I won't be booing the team or dragging my knuckles you can rest assured on that.

Blinkers? I don't vote for either of them, but I can see which one is the real fraud when it comes to pretending to be interested in football.

It's not a question of which one is a football fan as you well know. One has criticised attendance yet is attending himself. Surely even you can see the rank hypocrisy.
As a critic of whataboutery you are really good at it yourself.

Do you think half the people watching tonight give a fuss about football - it’s about national success

And for the politicians it’s about perception - Johnson looks like a plank with his England shirt over his shirt and tie, Starmer out does him again sat in a private room in Ireland for the Germany game with just his aides for company, now he criticises the crowds then jumps in there himself.

When Starmer first got the gig I thought he was gunna turn things round but he’s turning into a bigger liability than Corbyn and that’s saying something. Gunna take the Labour a decade to pull itself back to anywhere near challenging

Jeez, stop reading the right wing press people! Honestly, it really is painful to see the stuff in the Mail and Sun just regurgitated on here without any thought being given to it.

So he's not going to be at the match then?

At the end of the day he is the leader of the opposition and it would be expected for him to attend a final at Wembley. If he had not then we would have the usual rubbish that he is anti U.K. and still longs for Brexit to be reversed.
What you are saying is if he should not attend because you consider him an hypocrite whilst others would say he had to attend or he hates his country.

He can do as he chooses and I certainly don't think he hates his country. He is, however, a hypocrite of that there is no doubt.

And you could say Boris is a dangerous pathological liar and which is worse.

More whataboutery. Classic

No just honesty rather than gullibility by those who believes his lies or that they don’t matter.

The thread is about Starmer. Have you anything to say about him and his hypocrisy

No not at all, in fact if you read the first post it was regarding honesty and telling lies.

Would it ?
Certainly not by me.
Why would it make him Anti UK if he didn't attend ? I wasn't aware the UK were playing in the final.
Really poor effort to defend the guy, but then again come to expect it on here.

Come off it, you remember the Mail two page spread trying to malign Ed Milliband’s deceased father for hating England when it was in fact complete and utter rubbish. I am sure if he had not turned up the Sun etc. would come at his non appearance as a sign of his anti England (to make you happy) stance or are you so naive to believe otherwise.
It is easy to forget it was not the U.K. playing when you look at how Johnson has promoted the team. He can now go back to his wiff waff or whatever he use to do at Eton.

Do you really think that Starmer blagging a ticket to the final is the biggest problem we have regarding covid.
You should be on stage man.

It will be notable just how few politicians and royals are interested in the RL World Cup, even if we were to make the final !

I am sure Starmer would have been bored out of his mind on Sunday but he has no choice but to attend - I would agree Boris will not attend the RLWC final I bet he would have preferred to be at Wimbledon rather than Wembley.

I saw what you did here, two separate issues, your clearly upset with this government but to actually blame them for covid borders on the embarrassing trying to link the two, as for the leader of the alternative party blagging a ticket it's simply an exercise in vote catching, the mans a bigger fraud than that idiot he succeeded, I'm sure he'd sooner be somewhere else than stood with the great unwashed with his false smirk, after all it's not as though his reputation will suffer

Was he actually there ?
He certainly didn't mange to attract the camera man's attention ?

As for fraud, I think that you need to look at the jovial blond fella that lives at no 10

Do you want me to send you a list ?

Grow up please

Is that surprising, why would the cameraman seek out a Z list celebrity with all those B list celebs queueing up for attention, lets face it you've either got it or you haven't and the alternative party leader falls woefully short, just like his party really.

Not sure what list you want to send me but crack on with it, I'm sure it will be weighted in your favour

Perhaps you should grow up yourself , or you could simply tell me where I'm going wrong and convert me into joining the alternative party apologies for having a different opinion to yours.

Is this more stuff based on absolutely nothing ? It doesn't take much research to find out you're totally wrong.