For scientific purposes, yes.

maybe he's referring to the episode of Only Fools and Horses where the statue cries, was a miracle!

Just because kirkstaller (in common with a lot of other people) has his belief, that doesn't necessarily mean he is brainwashed.
He could just as easily be deluded, irrational, blinkered, illogical, needy or just plain wrong ... all without having been brainwashed.

well someone appears to have a sense of humour. I've just been informed that my latest follower on twitter is:


Jews for Jesus

should be fun

Some years ago, I had a legacy from an elderly great aunt in Plymouth. The legacies, before the estate was shared out, included one to Bibles for Israel.

Go on, then, just post ONE piece of your "ample evidence", to be going on with. Then we can have some fun.

Of course, you can't, so will instead either retort with some pathetic rhetorical device, or more probably as usual pretend that I have not asked you anything, in the adult equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears, or hiding under the bed.

The Turin Shroud I can live with, it has a stain that might look like a man, or not, and because it might look like a man doesn't mean that its the same man known from the bible as Jesus, he could have been a soft fat black man for all we know.

Anyway...

The Turin Shroud aside, when you see a Jesus face on a slice of toast - what does that mean, and why does he do things like that - to fook with the minds of the gullible ?

I bet he has a right laugh some days.

It's a signal to kirkstaller to put the kettle on.

still not answering your questions I notice, he's nearly as fickle as his god about making appearances.

I'm sure he'll be along presently with a link to 'Answers In Genesis', or summat.

You were the one who scuttled off last time.

As for evidence, by the far most convincing is the daily spiritual relationship I have with Jesus. Second is the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth. Third, the creation which surrounds us.

The what? FFS.

I see the clique are ganging up again!

The poster in question has chosen to join an already ongoing discussion, they have posted their views, people are allowed to challenge them, if the poster considers this bullying then they have the option to move on and not post on threads such as this.

Now if you have nowt else to add to the conversation I suggest you do one.

And he could be none of the above.

Let he who is without sin...

I prefer

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

Quote ="Standee"maybe he's referring to the episode of Only Fools and Horses where the statue cries, was a miracle!'" Amazingly boingboing.net/2012/04/13/indian ... -with.html

Quote ="Standee"maybe he's referring to the episode of Only Fools and Horses where the statue cries, was a miracle!'" Amazingly boingboing.net/2012/04/13/indian ... -with.html

Epic fail.

It's a euphemism for [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesusfairytale[/url

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-18622363What would Jesus do?[/url

Quite so.
I am not saying he's right, just that he's not necessarily brainwashed.

I wonder if the author of that quote is feeling quite so smug now?

Do you think your post may offend some people?

Eh?
I can see past the small typo (mug = smug) but I haven't a clue what you mean.

Thanks, I've edited it now.



That quote is attributed to a very famous enemy of God. That individual will recently have had to give an account of himself. He will have had to explain his blasphemy, drunkenness, homosexual flings etc.

The Bible tells us that there is a Heaven and and Hell. I wonder which one he is in