Quote ="Mintball"Only today the [iMail[/i is reporting on criticisms of Gwyneth Paltrow helping market overtly sexualised bikinis for tots – a publication that, in its online form, profits from quite deliberately sexualising underage girls. The sheer brass neck of it is astonishing.'"
Would I be far off the mark in suggesting that the condemnation of Paltrow included a fair number of the "outrageous" pictures from said website?
