Quote ="V6Chuk"The fact she is religious should be enough to get her off any jury. I’m not sure someone who determines their own life based on blind faith can ever be trusted to determine another’s life by deriving conclusions based on empirical evidence?
These are people who, at the end of the day, will quite happily throw all reason out of the window and go with ‘a feeling they just have’ or some other sanctimonious rubbish.'"
You're saying that when being judged by a jury of your peers there should be legally set limits on precisely the kind of peers you're allowed to be judged by, and that those limits should be defined by what you perceive their private thoughts and belief system to be?
That seems ever so slightly tyrannically dumb of you, and it obviously couldn't ever be abused.
