Ey up! Looks like the big boys are [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36446023weighing in[/url.

What is your source for that assertion? Churchill's September 1946 speech on the subject ended:

"The first step is to form a Council of Europe.

.....

.....

In all this urgent work, France and Germany must take the lead together.

Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America, and I trust a Soviet Russia - for then indeed all would be well - must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe and must champion its right to live and shine."

Crapping themselves in case their bosses in the U.S. make them move to boring Frankfurt where they won't understand the language!

Testing the influence of Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi on the EU is very simple:

Compare what [iwas[/i proposed in the "Kalergi Plan" with what [iis[/i taking place right now.

As for Churchill ... he'd most likely be a supporter.

The main argument from the remain side seems to be 'yeah we know the EU is sh*t and it's only going to get worse but do you really want to risk a step into the unknown?'

The thought of Boris and Micheal ending up in charge of Britain scares the life out of me , however the hypocrisy being displayed by the ' in ' campaign is quite ridiculous

Short term pain for long term gain for me , out

What long term gain would that be, precisely?

I'll be voting to stay in as I am not any of the following:

1. Ill-informed
2. Xenophobic
3. Stupid
4. A conspiracy fruitcake
5. All of the above

Plus Brexiters make me embarrassed to be British.

I believe we will have no problems trading with the world including the EU after initially seeing short term issues

All entitled to an opinion I would hope , or perhaps not

Do you think the EU is a true democracy and are you happy with the unelected bureaucrats?

1. Why are all brexiters ill informed?
2. I love immigration and those voting to exit purely based on immigration also embarrass me.
3. There are some extremely bright brexiters and to call them all stupid does yourself a disservice
4. There are some i won't disagree

Giving future generations the right to self determination?

Self-determination is ALWAYS the right choice but I'm afraid both sides are deluding themselves here. Just look at the nations which have attempted to pursue a path of true self-determination over the last few decades (Iraq, Iran, Yugoslavia etc.) - not a pretty sight, is it?

From the beginning this vote has almost exclusively been about personalities rather than tangible policies. Which tells me it's a contrived wedge-issue specifically designed to make people think they really do have a say in the political process.

Basically, there's something big in the pipeline. Cameron has taken his full body burden of radioactivity and so it's time to bring in someone fresh whilst making sure that the public thinks it was their decision all along.

I've said it before but no decision which is as important as mainstream media currently emphasizes would ever be left to the whims of the unwashed masses.

Just look at some of the posts above. I wouldn't trust most of these morons to eat with a fork and not stab themselves in the eye. And now you wish to put DEMOCRACY itself in their hands?

And you instill confidence with your crazy theories ?

The day I gain your confidence is the day I really start worrying.

So Mugwump of you had to be devils advocate and argue the positives of the EU what would they be?

Personally i can freely admit there are many things i have agreed with and have no issue with but democracy is sacrosanct and trumps all. Even if it is an illusion of democracy, I'd rather live in that than a blatant dictatorship.

Democracy is just another shell game. Whilst these days its virtues are held to be self-evident what most people don't realise is this idea is a relatively new phenomenon.

Anyone who has read the works of Plato, Aristotle, Thucydides (especially) etc. knows that the Greeks very quickly realised that Democracy is a mug's game which is wide open to demagoguery and oligarchy. Most of the Greek city states flat out REFUSED to become democratic and literally had it forced upon them at the tip of an Athenian spear.

If Democracy was such a great thing why is it Athens lay in ruins soon after instituting it? Why is it Plato (widely considered the greatest philosopher who ever lived) had nary a good word to say about it and blamed it for the death of his hero, Socrates?

Look back through history and you'll find far kinder things said about the Spartan political system. Indeed, the Spartan model was considered preferable right up to the arrival of Hitler.

I'm not saying I concur with this opinion, BTW. I'm just pointing out.

The word you should really be looking for is "Freedom". Without wishing to get into a very long and complicated discussion about the nature of "Freedom" what I will say is that Democracy and Freedom are NOT the same thing.

Take the parliamentary system. The notion that someone can represent YOUR interests in addition to the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker as well as BAE systems down the road is patently absurd. Representative democracy was perhaps a good idea when it took a week to travel down to London and back via carriage. But this is the Information Age we are living in. When information travels at the speed of light there is no need for any MPs. We could all vote electronically and that would be a much fairer system and certainly more representative.

What are the "positives" of the EU? It's a tough question because I am not part of the class of people the EU was created primarily to benefit. The truth is you and I are practically irrelevant to any decision which will come out of this vote.

As long as we remain at each other's throats over non-issues such as this we will have no say in our future. It reminds me of endless squabbles I've heard between ostensible "Labour" and "Tory" supporters who are too stupid to see that for a very long time now (perhaps it's always been this way in terms of trend) the [iworst government is always the next one (or at least for those people who are part of the "99%"icon_wink.gif.[/i

Ever since the Bolshevik revolution the direction has been toward greater unification rather than self-determination and Britain just isn't strong enough to buck this trend. Which means no matter what the likes of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Farage etc. say it's not on the table.

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEzOgpMWnVsTHIS[/url is what happens to nations that harbour aspirations of self-determination.

If any nation attempted to balance the needs of big business against those of the people Yugoslavia, with its vibrant post-Tito mixed economy, stood out as a beacon.

Which is the reason it was ruthlessly smashed and Balkanised by the global gangster elite.

Thanks for the link

There's a really good documentary made from a Serbian perspective. If I can remember the name of it I'll post a link. Suffice to say there's a whopping disconnect between how mainstream media in the US & UK portrayed the Serbian-Milosevic government and reality.

C-SPAN gave a pretty hostile [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8or18rPZUE0interview of Milosevic[/url in which I thought he gave a creditable performance.

Now, I'm not saying the guy was all sugar and spice. But you have to remember that he was balancing the needs of the entire nation against the very bitter (and understandable) resentment the Serbs had for the ethnic genocide they suffered during WWII at the hands of the Croats.

Did anyone watch the SHAM that was the international tribunal before which Milosevic was brought? I knew something was very, very wrong when they kept censoring his words. To say I wasn't surprised when he died of an "apparent heart attack" in prison is an understatement.

The fact that we imposed outright fascist governments on the newly created former Yugoslavian states tells you a lot about what the objectives of the war were.

I've said this for years now - Yugoslavia was a very public and brutal message to anyone harboring delusional notions of self-determination. It is completely intolerable to the owning class and any attempt to follow such a path will be ruthlessly suppressed.

With this in mind you have to ask - what kind of "self-determination" are Boris and Michael offering?

Ever watched one of those vampire films? Remember how you must "invite" Dracula into your home before he can enter?

The illusion of democracy works best when the people willingly gravitate toward a leader. Right now their man, Cameron, is toxic. Yet how do they get people to switch allegiance to another Tory when the entire party is perceived to be corrupt and filled with nutters?

The answer lies in taking advantage of wedge-issues they've been cultivating for several years now ... national sovereignty, immigration etc. It wasn't all that long ago when you couldn't get a cigarette paper between Johnson & Cameron. Yet now you'd swear the former was Churchill re-incarnated (he's even wrote a BOOK on Churchill ... LOL).

I mean, after all this pantomime is anyone any the wiser about what EXACTLY will happen (policy-wise) the moment a decision to leave or stay is made?

We have no problem doing so now. So you would have us endure 'short term' pain for no net gain.

Yay you.

Where did I suggest that you weren't?

I do, however, reserve the right to pour scorn on it.

There are no true democracies on the planet and the UK is run by an unelected bureaucracy. The EU is no more and no less democratic than any Western country of your choice.

1. I don't know. Laziness? Gullibility? Stupidity? You tell me.
2. That would be the vast majority then.
3. Stupid was just one item on the list. They could easily be one or more of the others.
4. The vast majority of Brexiters are xenophobic at some level. Just look at the peak in the numbers whenever another immigration scare story hits the news.

Popycock. The EU is not any kind of existential threat to self-determination and young voters are overwhelming in favour of remaining in it.

The EU is a threat to certain right-wing interests being able to screw the rest of us over. Which is why the usual suspects are leading the Out vote.

Why would he care? I've searched all sixteen pages of this thread and I can't find a single post of yours which convinces me that your opinion is worth entertaining.

I mean, aside from telling everyone that you aren't a racist, xenophobe etc

etc. etc. what have you said?