No, it's an indication of a less than useless Business Minister and a bunch of even more less than useless MEPs

How do you work that one out?

Vince Cable was aggressively lobbied about the potential implications to SMEs, he took absolutely no notice

Didn't one of the links explain that the UK has lobbied to try to relieve the burden on small business but to little avail?

Yes, the lobby was to try and enforce the standard UK turnover threshold of £80k (or thereabouts) on this legislation which would alleviate a lot of the problems that its going to cause, particularly next year, but the reason not to do so was that each EU country has its own threshold so it would be unworkable despite the fact that each EU country has its own level of VAT but that is not unworkable



One concession was made which was to keep the UK threshold for VAT registration for UK sellers trading within the UK but then they still have to register to sell in the EU, which is the sort of crazy thinking that politicians go through, "Oh its ok because you don't have to register, but actually you have to register anyway".

So how easy is it to trade in the EU - very easy, in fact its so easy that you have no control over where your goods are being advertised, nor should you want to if you are serious about selling online and if your product can be downloaded then it makes perfect sense to sell all over the world - and you can bet that everyone else in the world will be trying to sell into the EU.

What it will do of course is to simply increase prices of all goods by one hell of a margin, overnight, what that will do for inflation has to be seen but for me selling artwork online my prices in the UK will be the same but they will increase by the VAT margin to any state in the EU and the reverse is true for any european trader selling to the UK, their prices will increase by 20% at a stroke, thats one hell of a concession from Vince the small business champion although of course in the manner of all civil servants he probably thought that small traders would just absorb the VAT and carry on regardless.

One other thought on the subject for next year, the raw materials that I currently purchase for my product are purchased from high street retailers and just looking at one of their receipts they do not break down the VAT element to me as an end user member of the public because they don't have to, all they currently have to do in law is show their VAT number but they don't issue a member of the public with a VAT invoice.

Thats going to have to change

Why is it going to change?

Because if a trader has to collect and submit VAT collected from EU consumers at no benefit to that trader, then you may as well go the whole hog and claim input VAT back, I would certainly want to do that because there is no way that I would be collecting VAT for a foreign government and not having some benefit to myself.

Just out of interest have you ever spoken to a VAT inspector and had their point of view and of how they are doing you a big favour by allowing you to collect their tax for them, I have, it was one of the funniest conversations I have ever had.

So not only will the retail craft establishments have to get used to printing the VAT content on their receipts but consumers, members of the public, may have to get used to seeing nett prices quoted on products, its normal practice for B2B to quote £xxx + VAT but not for retailers in a B2C scenario - if you are selling across Europe then you are commercially far better to quote nett plus vat rather than publish ten or fifteen vat inclusive prices.

Retailers normally issue simplified VAT invoices for sales up to £250 - which include VAT number, rates, etc So I am unclear of your point.

I'm sitting here looking at receipts from the likes of The Range and WH Smith both of whom are pretty much B2C outlets, no VAT breakdown on either of them, the only reference to VAT is their reg no, which is not a lot of use as a VAT invoice - they need to issue one like Staples who are used to dealing with B2C and B2B.

And another point

I sell to a client in Ireland a couple of times a year where they have a VAT rate of 23%, so the price to him as an end user will have to increase 23%, this element is then passed to the Irish government via the MOSS portal which from everything I have read will simply do that, you register a sale, they calculate the VAT for you, bill you, pass the tax onwards, no mention of input VAT though - so presumably I make separate claims to the UK government for relief on my purchases (and why shouldn't I), nett result being a loss to the UK revenue ?

Their receipts will itemise and give applicable VAT rate(s).

You buy your inputs and reclaim the VAT, so neutral to you. WH Smith et al charge you VAT and pass it to HMRC (again neutral).

You charge VAT to your Irish customer and the VAT gets paid to Ireland, so again neutral to you (provided you can commercially increase your prices by 23%) and to UK. In the chain just your customer pays the VAT. As a net importing country we should gain (assuming that we also 'import' more of this type of service than we 'export' - perhaps unlikely).

Not quite, the only one who wins is me, my nett retail prices don't increase but my raw material prices decrease for there is no opportunity for my suppliers (being national retailers) to charge me more than an ordinary member of the public, their prices already include VAT but you are not currently shown this element - thats a 20% discount that I shall get in future.

Because my work is unique then I will simply add the output VAT at the country of delivery's rate, that VAT is handled by the MOSS system, and the UK does not see that money, I claim my input VAT from the UK government so on that single transaction they owe me a credit.

Its true that in order to do this I will have to register and declare UK sales too so in the grand scheme of things they won't be sending me a cheque but at the end of a quarter I will be reclaiming a lot more VAT then I would normally have done which will adjust my liability downwards.

End result is that the consumer pays a lot more than they should for the lack of continuing the status quo as it stands now, potentially this will apply to every EU transaction on eBay too.


And here's me thinking I'd rid myself of all this VAT cr@p when I sold the previous business.

You only gain because you chose not to have a voluntary registration previously. You could have always reclaimed you input VAT.

Thats the whole point, having experience 24 years of VAT returns and escaped with my sanity you would not voluntarily submit yourself to the whole rigmoral again on a very small turnover, however if they insist on at least part of it then I'll go the whole hog and extract what I can from them, I do pity the small trader who operates on a part time basis, probably via eBay and who has no experience of government form filling and compliance to the ridiculous, it takes all the fun out of trading and will wear you down.

If you do have find you have to charge VAT and don't have too many materials to buy, the flat rate scheme is worth a look. Not sure how the scheme works for sales outside the UK (but it does seem to make some kind of provision) as it's never troubled me personally, but you charge say 20% VAT on your sales and pay HMRC a fixed rate of up to 14.5%, depending on what kind of business you're in. You then just do a simple VAT return on line every three months and set up a direct debit for your bill. The world of contracting provides the scheme with many members who shall we say, aren't well equipped to deal with complex VAT procedures

Yes I seem to recall the the flat rate scheme worked on industry averages ?

I personally prefer the standard way where you claim for each invoice separately, lets just say that it gives you a bit more flexibility

Not that I'd put the weekly shopping through as input or anything

It will also allow me to reclaim the VAT on my studio that I'm building, who knows I may even be able to bill myself for its rental, plus VAT ?

Meanwhile back to the Greek tragedy.

So after all the hubris from the new left wing Greek government it looks like the leadership will after all accept the reality of their self inflicted situation. Varoufakis after strutting around the EU telling everybody what he would not accept has now been humiliated. The terms he agreed last Friday included acceptance that the bailout package continues to be set and monitored by the Troika who will freeze the money if they are not satisfied with Greek commitment to economic reform - something that Syriza vowed it would never accept. As the German finance minister said "they certainly will have a difficult time explaining the deal to their voters"

Not quite the way it went but it does seem strange that you celebrate plutocracy over democracy

I am not celebrating plutocracy over democracy at all.

Because Syriza won their election with "looney election promises" does not make this particular bit of democracy more important than all the other Euro zone democratic states who insist on Greece sticking to the unanimously agreed terms of the huge bailouts which rescued Greece from disaster. Why should the taxpayers of all these countries write off the debt of the non taxpayers of Greece?

The Irish government has fulfilled the demands of the bailout lenders with admirable effect and now have returned to economic growth and they insist that Greece should be shown no special treatment. The former communist PM of Slovakia said last week "This is a red line for us. It would be impossible to explain to the public that poor Slovakia... should compensate Greece" Germany and the other countries do not represent a conspiracy of greedy lenders but in fact the taxpayers of the Eurozone which democratically is vastly more significant than the 36% of Greeks who bought the "looney election promises" of Syriza.

I see one of the economic comedians has returned.

Still waiting for answers to legitimate questions, but hey, the humour can ease the wait.

Give him time, he's got to log back in to the right account first.

Nothing wrong with keeping the rugby hat separate from the political one.

So no comments on the U turn of the lefty leadership in Greece then?

So, can we roll back to CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that the Greek people (or the 95% outside of the top earnings bracket) have borrowed significantly more than the average European (or the 95% outside of the top earnings bracket)?

Oh, and throw in CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that the Greek people (or the 95% outside of the top earnings bracket) are more corrupt than the average European (or the 95% outside of the top earnings bracket).

Just so we can be sure, ya know.

Anyone?