Yes but the person on the receiving end here was that nasty nasty Baby P murderer, and Baby P was much loved by all the media and public who never knew him, so therefore deserves to be called a paedophile/rapist/etc etc....

That was sarcasm

It was Baby P's father, not his murderer.

Give that man a cigar.
They all wrongly thought they were untouchable.

This is what happens when folks are so used to doing and getting away with what the hell they want, They lose all sense of realism and moral's

The self-same staff who have recently been scurrying to the NUJ to help them out?

Surely not!

[url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/9131338/Phone-hacking-can-these-journalists-really-get-a-fair-trial.htmlLeveson could prejudice a fair trial[/url

So Rebekah Brooks's lawyer is claiming. After a culture of systemically subverting justice, all in the name of flogging a few more papers, it's a bit rich claiming that as a defence.

Not a bit. The true victims are not this bloke, whose life may be ruined with the false stigma of paedophilia, but people like the skint but fragrant Gordon Taylor, who they AGREED to pay £700,000 just for an agreement to keep schtumm about having his voicemails hacked. That is clearly at the very least 10 times worse than calling him a paedo, wouldn't you agree?

Oh - soz, I forgot. If you're paying the money to keep the shiit from hitting the fan, that's alright.

In fact, so arrogant are they, they probably actually believed that with a few millions they really could bury it.

The ginger one has been lifted again.

Plus hubby.

[urlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17349578[/url

Unconnected. The beast just want their horse back.

But properly this time – not by appointment.

I see they got the sniffer dogs out.

Given the reason: "attempting to pervert the course of justice, I wonder if it's [url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8647877/Phone-Hacking-Brooks-husband-denies-cover-up-after-bag-found-near-flat.htmlanything to do with this?[/url

Yup. One of Call me Daves Eton buddies. He was a cr@p horse racing trainer as well. Took over the stables of the legend that was Fred Winters stables. Wasn't fit to lace his boots.

It's rumoured they were having sex when arrested. He's been charged with having an offensive person on his weapon.

Thanks to The Media Blog for tweeting this

"She's been arrested again" would be a great name for a Cheltenham race winner.

Not quite News International but News Corp anyway - responsible for bringing down Sky's competitor, On Digital. www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17522112 TV hacking rather than phone hacking.

Not quite News International but News Corp anyway - responsible for bringing down Sky's competitor, On Digital. www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-17522112 TV hacking rather than phone hacking.

[urlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17536217[/url

And its not confined to the UK. Perhaps Rupey should have been more humble in front of the parliamentary committee

So, OnDigital's biggest shareholder was Carlton Communications, any guesses as to who was [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/20/david-cameron-the-pr-yearsHead of Communications at Carlton[/url at the time of all this skullduggery?

cant be more than 18 characters

Lewis Carroll didn't have the depth of the rabbit hole right at all, did he?

Looks like James Murdoch is stepping down from his lead role at BSkyB.

Stepping down as non-exec chairman, remaining on the board.

Oh, and NI are late filing their accounts - [url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2012/apr/04/newsinternational-mediabusiness?CMP=twt_fdreport[/url

It should be pointed out that the accusations re Pay TV in Australia were made by Fairfax press, the direct competitor to News here, and that they have already started to backpedal from their initial attempt to link the newspaper hacking in the UK to the Pay TV award here. Theer was also no hacking involved apparantly.

I think one question ought to be asked as well - how come Britain has such a dreadful, toxic tabloid print media? There is nothing like it at all here - the tabloid stuff lives on supposed 'current affairs' shows on TV (including the imaginatively named "A Current Affair"icon_wink.gif. The TV shows' popularity suggests that there's an appetite for salacious gossip and the like. So why no printed tabloids here? Why does the UK have such a roll call of tabloid dreadfuls, almost unique in the world - at least in terms of scale of their readership?