Not Martin Luthor King's "I have a dream" speech but today is also the 50th anniversary of the [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23795655Bristol Bus boycott[/url

It's shameful to think that in my living memory, British citizens could operate such discrimination, we have come so far since then but have we come far enough? There are still instances of a need to opertate positive discrimination in order to better represent the proportion of not just race and ethicity but also sexuality and gender.

We still have some way to travel

We have come an awful long way since 1963 and its down to integration and a generation or two moving on - in my own personal experience prejudice on the grounds of skin colour was a perfectly acceptable state right through the 1960s and if you want the definition of "perfectly acceptable" then look to the media of the time, and the country's leaders.

On prime time TV (and they had huge audiences) were programs that are not shown as repeats today or shown on nostalgia compilations simply because they would be unacceptable and possibly illegal, one of the biggest audiences every Monday evening at 7pm was for "The Comedians", most of which cannot be shown now, and of course there are the obvious sit-coms through the 60s and 70s, not to mention Spike Milligan and Peter Sellers doing their blacked-up, turbaned dumb Indian/Pakistani turns.

The famous Enoch Powell "rivers of blood" speech [urlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html[/url was derided at the time by politicians and comedians, not because it was a wake-up call to racism but because it was an unpalatable truth about the racist nature of our white society, a truth that we didn't want to be reminded of especially when we could see what was going on in the USA.

From my viewpoint I didn't know, or speak to, any black people until I started Technical college at 17 years of age, my all-boys Grammar School of 800 pupils had no black or asian members on the staff or in the pupil roll call until I'd been there for three eyars and a Sikh boy started in the first year, he started that school year a day later than everyone else so that the Head could warn the whole school at an assembly that the new "coloured boy" was not to be harassed or persecuted, with dire consequences if he was, and of course he was. - likewise the same thing happened a year later when the school took in its first severely disabled boy who's parents had chosen not to send him to "special school" - when I say "first" in both of these examples I really do mean the first time they had admitted non-white or disabled pupils, in at least 100 years of history, I don't know whether that was coincidence or by design, but there you are.

My parents generation and those before them were just part of the institutionalised racism and discrimination against anything not like themselves, my generation had to learn with the aid of legislation to rid our minds of such thoughts, my childrens generation simply don't see an issue and think that I invent much of the stuff that used to pass for normal in the UK in the 1960s and 70s.

To me THAT is real progress.

I think immigration eventually helps overcome racism. I was born and raised in Wigan then at 18 moved to Manchester and now (23) Salford. In Wigan it's 96% non-Black minority ethnic, and attitudes seem pretty backwards compared to how they seem to be in Manchester and Salford, even amongst lots of young people. I guess it's much harder to hate black people, muslims etc if you have actually integrated with them from a young age.

I believe discrimination of this kind is still a large minority. I work at a well-known tourist attraction in the North West, and only a few days ago we had a complaint from a customer because there were too many Asian customers.

I think it will take 4-5 generations for this type of mentality to die off, mainly because attitudes to ethnic minorities can be passed down from grandfather to father to son. It'll be a while until stories like this become a thing of the past.

What did you tell this customer who complained to you ?

you're right about that, too many kids too dumb to think for themselves so won't consider the fact their elders might just be talking shiite.

Meanwhile across the pond, it looks like some things have hardly changed at all in the South

[url=http://progressivepopulist.org/2013/08/23/blacks-asked-to-leave-south-carolina-restaurant-because-white-customer-felt-threatened-video/Blacks asked to leave restaurant because white patron felt "threatened"[/url

Did anyone see that Stephen Fry programme recently where, amongst other set-ups, an actor played the (convincing) part of a racist waiter in a genuine restaurant, to see how many would object to his behaviour?
Although unscientific, it seemed to show that, whilst most people didn't like the racism and would murmur disapproval to each other, not many were prepared to speak up and challenge it immediately.
A lesson for us all there.
Silent or repressed disapproval is simply not good enough.

[url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9221047/Black-people-cannot-be-racist-says-former-Ken-Livingstone-aide.htmlIndeed[/url

I'm intrigued by your call for positive discrimination in the job market, re sexuality and gender. Perhaps you could expand your thoughts on how you would judge the merits of a one legged Nigerian lesbian with a limited grasp of the English language, to be a better fit in the workplace, rather than say, an overly flamboyant Anglo Saxon transvestite chappie in the John Inman stylee. Extra points awarded for post op rather than simply a Friday night Freda?

And at the second interview, would pictures of the candidate on all fours wearing a gimp mask, and being enthusiastically rogered by large strap on wearing female, possibly trump the NVQ qualifications of a more "normal" applicant?

In this bold new world are there any lines in the sand? Would peadophilia or necrophobia simply be considered as an expression of a persons sexuality, and not in anyway an impediment to a full and fruitful career at Codhead PLC?

I think you're letting your fantasies get in the way of a simple attitude of inclusive recruiting, sometimes SOME businesses need to just step back and ask themselves some very simple questions as to how their staff at the varying levels of their organisation represent a mix of society, especially organisations who's primary business is to provide a service to that society - its something that (for instance) large retailers usually do very well with their public facing staff, unfortunately its not always reflected in the back office and especially as you climb further up the management tree - its good sometimes to take a reflective view and ask why.

You'll never see full equality while wits like this are able to breed.

How do they know 1) That the complaint was from a white person 2) That race was the reason they didn't want them seated near them.

They were asked to leave when one of them whipped out their cell phone and started recording. Would you have accepted someone sticking a camera in your face and recording you?

It's like Oprah Winfrey's recent call that she was racially discriminated against because a Swiss sales assistant didn't think she could afford to buy their stupidly expensive handbags. But the fact is that very few people are that rich to be able to waste so much money on crap. Part of the woman's job would have been to not let poor people handle $35,000 hand bags.

So the woman wrongly thought Winfrey couldn't afford to waste that much money. She was clearly wrong. Winfrey could have easily and bitchily pointed that out, but instead she chose to go on TV to whine about it. It MIGHT have been racism, but it could have had nothing to do with race.

It's said in the report.

It says that someone started videoing it, that is not necessarily the same as your assertion about "sticking a camera in your face".
You have assumed aggression by the videoing person but the report does not mention or imply it.

Are you sure she didn't?

No it didn't.



Which became "waited 2hrs, patiently and were refused service because another customer (White) felt threatened by us" on Mike London's Facebook post.

Quote ="Lord God Jose Mourinho"... It's like Oprah Winfrey's recent call that she was racially discriminated against because a Swiss sales assistant didn't think she could afford to buy their stupidly expensive handbags. But the fact is that very few people are that rich to be able to waste so much money on crap. Part of the woman's job would have been to not let poor people handle $35,000 hand bags. So the woman wrongly thought Winfrey couldn't afford to waste that much money. She was clearly wrong. Winfrey could have easily and bitchily pointed that out, but instead she chose to go on TV to whine about it. It MIGHT have been racism, but it could have had nothing to do with race.'" Except the actual assistant denies she did any such, and says Oprah made it up. www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/opra ... ow-2157350

Quote ="Lord God Jose Mourinho"... It's like Oprah Winfrey's recent call that she was racially discriminated against because a Swiss sales assistant didn't think she could afford to buy their stupidly expensive handbags. But the fact is that very few people are that rich to be able to waste so much money on crap. Part of the woman's job would have been to not let poor people handle $35,000 hand bags. So the woman wrongly thought Winfrey couldn't afford to waste that much money. She was clearly wrong. Winfrey could have easily and bitchily pointed that out, but instead she chose to go on TV to whine about it. It MIGHT have been racism, but it could have had nothing to do with race.'" Except the actual assistant denies she did any such, and says Oprah made it up. www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/opra ... ow-2157350

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"Except the actual assistant denies she did any such, and says Oprah made it up. www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/opra ... ow-2157350'" I was just writing from seeing a clip of Winfrey. Winfrey claimed that as an example of clear racism, to me it COULD have been racism, but could have just as easily have been a misunderstanding. The shop assistant has a completely different version of events. No one apart from those two know what happened. The shop assistant is probably going to deny doing anything wrong, even if she did. But Winfrey could have easily complained to a manager about the store assistant and chose not to. Did Winfrey cause this storm on purpose, to campaign about racism, or was her comment an unguarded comment to a journo that happened to be followed up by media around the world? I haven't followed this story, but I knew of Winfrey's interview and I later saw a Sky reporter interviewing a male assistant at the store who was explaining that she didn't work there any more.

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"Except the actual assistant denies she did any such, and says Oprah made it up. www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/opra ... ow-2157350'" I was just writing from seeing a clip of Winfrey. Winfrey claimed that as an example of clear racism, to me it COULD have been racism, but could have just as easily have been a misunderstanding. The shop assistant has a completely different version of events. No one apart from those two know what happened. The shop assistant is probably going to deny doing anything wrong, even if she did. But Winfrey could have easily complained to a manager about the store assistant and chose not to. Did Winfrey cause this storm on purpose, to campaign about racism, or was her comment an unguarded comment to a journo that happened to be followed up by media around the world? I haven't followed this story, but I knew of Winfrey's interview and I later saw a Sky reporter interviewing a male assistant at the store who was explaining that she didn't work there any more.

Fortunately I was not the one who received the complaint, but if I did I no doubt wouldn't have a job on the grounds of being disrespectful to customers...

Whatever the true facts of what happened, Winfrey has jumped to a totally unwarranted conclusion, that the only reason anyone would think she wouldn't be interested in a £30K handbag must be coz she's black innit.

If I worked in such a shop, to me the worse thing would be to get the 30K bag to show someone, they examine it and really like it, but are then humiliated when asking the price since it is way out of their league, as it would be for 99% of the population.

Why couldn't the conversation go
"Can i see that bag?"
I don't think you could afford it"
"Yes, I could, actually"
"Really? Well, if you're sure. I didn't want to embarrass you."

I might continue:

" Honestly you're the first person I ever met who is so crassly dumb and insensitive as to even consider trashing such an unconscionable amount of good money on a piece of pretentious crap just because they can. "

Why couldn't the conversation just go
"Can I see that bag?"
"Certainly"

Presumably, part of the the sales assistant's role is to stop time wasters handling the £30k bag, and as such they have to make sure that the person can actually afford it before they man-handle it.

I guess the conversation actually started:

"Can I see that bag?"
"Are you sure you can afford it, it is £30k?"

Throw in a bit of cross-lingual confusion, and results in Oprah storming off in a huff, probably with a "don't you know who I am"

You are Gerald Ratner and I claim my piece of tat

My wife was very upset at the look the shop assistant gave her when she admitted that she couldn't actually afford the 400 euro handbag she'd fallen in love with.

My sympathies were entirely with the shop assistant.

So it does then.