Quote ="GUBRATS"As Martyn Lewis has suggested , economically NOBODY knows what will defiantly happen,'"
And yet history is littered with CAST-IRON evidence
[url=https://www.amazon.co.uk/All-Presidents-Bankers-Nomi-Prins/dp/1568584792here[/url, and
[url=https://www.amazon.co.uk/Flash-Boys-Michael-Lewis/dp/0141981032here[/url and
[url=https://www.amazon.co.uk/Flash-Boys-Michael-Lewis/dp/0141981032here[/url (plus a hundred or so other books I could mention) of people benefiting enormously from KNOWING what will happen before it does.
Just how are we to reconcile the Great Sage of the Daily Mail's arguments with the above evidence?
Simple, really. Like every halfwit who repeats this garbage, Lewis' mistake is not in stating that complex and chaotic systems are, by definition, unpredictable (a.k.a. stating the BLOODY OBVIOUS
) - it is in the implicit assumption that all economics is complex and chaotic.
Insider trading is successful precisely because it transforms a non-deterministic (unpredictable) system into a deterministic (predictable) one.
And insider trading (such as the type highlighted in Michael Lewis's "Flashboys"icon_wink.gif is but one in a very, very long line of techniques of "gaming" a system.
Quote there are no facts , just opinions'"
You do realise this is a logical fallacy? If there are no facts then your fact that "there are no facts" is opinion ... not fact.
=#FF0000Score: E- (Must try harder)