Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"You really are the biggest obnoxious hypocrite to ever roam these boards.'"
... says the man who whinges non-stop about perceived [iad hominem[/i against his own drivel
Quote ="FLAT STANLEY" Firstly you imply Mugwump effectively having his own blog, '"
I don't "imply" anything, he very clearly has! Are you saying it isn't basically that?
Quote ="FLAT STANLEY"...when effectively YOU have your own thread in which you were made a moderator of to STOP me from truth bombing the hell out of it, you vented pandemonia due to me posting ON[u YOUR[/u SCIENCE FICTION ASTRONOMY THREAD. '"
Wait a minute, what the fsck is your point? If I were COMPLAINING about Mugwump's blog thread then that might be hypocritical but
of course I'm not!!! On the contrary! I merely make an observation as to that thread. I would rarely post it it, but have no issue whatsoever with its existence or rules. So what the fsck is hypocritical about that?
The truth is, there are TWO separate threads. The Astronomy thread is for straight, non-conspiracy, information and discussion. The second is for discussing matters conspiratorial. If there is something on the rational Astronomy thread that you want to "truth bomb"
then feel free - but in the thread designed for the purpose!
You fail to see such an obvious point. That not everyone wants every single thread, on whatever news emerges in the world, to be instantly taken over by delusionals such as you claiming to know "the truth" about what really happened, and peddling your mad conspiracist bunkum. You are free to do it - in the appropriate place. You don't need to be able to pollute
EVERY thread.
The essential point though is not about whether your drivel is right, or I am wrong. It is about the forum rules which prohibit behaviour such as deliberately diverting threads, etc etc.
It's just housekeeping. The Astronomy thread is just ONE THREAD. If you have anything to post on the same subject, you can do so in the delusionals thread, anyone who wants to discuss it with you (self-included) will see it just the same and will post in reply just the same. Everyone knows this.
Mugwump seems happy with his blog thread, and (not that it matters, but just to be clear) that's fine by me. The point is, anyone who does want to stick within the strictly defined rules for subject matter of that thread is FREE TO DO SO. Ditto the Astronomy thread. But I do note you're not calling him a hypocrite for ruthlessly censoring dissent in that thread. Why is that, Stan? Because you operate double standards. It's a thread where you are able to post your stuff, and so that's fine. But you wouldn't, if it was up to you, agree to extend the same courtesy to people who want to stick with the straight Astronomy thread. that is why you are a stinking hypocrite.
The reality is that YOU are the stinking hypocrite, because you want to pollute and smokescreen anything you don't agree with by spewing acres of drivel at it. You are attempting to act as a censor. That is illustrated by your ignoring any questions or points put to you. All you want is a platform for your mad ramblings. You can't deal with criticism, and you won't consider any alternatives.
Nobody is saying you can't put your deluded views. It's not as if we are short of them. Just do it a centimetre down the fscking page.
I'm sure it was a coincidence and that £4 didn't spoil that bookies day but who knows, this was Catterick and they are a bit strange up there.'"
