Quote ="Mintball"Incorrect.
Let's look at what was said, since you appear to have as limited a mind as Ajw71, which I admit to finding slightly disappointing.
These comments do not contradict each other.
There are, that I can see, three possible explanations for saying that a name sounded 'too Jewish' to get one elected as PM – not one.
I'll list them for you.
1) He was anti-semitic himself.
2) He considered the British electorate at large to be anti-semitic.
3) He considered Conservative voters to be anti-semitic.
There may be more, but I can see those three. You and Ajw71 are welcome to show that in previous posts I meant any one, or a combination of any of them. Since you've quoted the relevant posts yourself, you won't even need to hunt far and wide.
And he was "an arrogant little teenage tosspot" because he was a teenager who had already decided that he wanted to be prime minister; in other words, to rule. But that's what a public school education gives you – that arrogant belief in your divine right to lord it over everyone else, even if your only work talent is for folding towels.'"
But my Dear, we were not discussing what the reasons could possibly be for changing his name. Although you appear to be more than happy to parade your own anti semetic leanings dressed up as "an explanation as to why a name may sound too Jewish"
I was simply highlighting your short term memory loss in your two posts, in which you claimed you were not responsible and pointed the finger at Private Eye....
And yet in an earlier post. " He changed it because he was an arrogant little teenage tosspot who had already decided he wanted to be PM, and because he thought it sounded a bit too Jewish to help him in that."
No mention in there I can see of Ian Hyslop, or Private Eye, so it is reasonable to assume, that as you posted this nonsense, this is what your views are.
You have been weighed Minty, and found wanting.
