Quote ="BrisbaneRhino"As for Germany "what they are putting in place" is coal-fired generation on a large scale - i.e. the highest carbon-intensity large-scale generation technology currently available (natural gas at worst producing only 2/3 of the emssions of coal, and with more efficient CCGT plant less than half).'"
Aren't you assuming the Germans will just pump the emissions out into the atmosphere and not attempt to mitigate them in any way?
I don't know of they are or not but it just seems odd to me that if a country such as Germany is starting to build coal fired power stations they will be building plants as dirty as we might expect in some third world country.
Given the cost of nuclear has anyone in the UK considered given the fact there is still many years of coal reserves left that were previously deemed too expensive to extract, that in comparison to nuclear that cost is now not out of order? If the technology exists to produce clean coal fired power stations I would certainly prefer that compared to nuclear if the cost is roughly the same.